Jump to content

Talk:List of largest buildings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Imam Raza Shrine

[edit]

As mentioned in this Wikipedia list , the shrine is even larger in footprint than the Grand mosque in Mecca, why is it not mentioned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notumengi (talkcontribs) 18:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Tire Warehouse in Bolton, ON

[edit]

A 1.6 million square foot warehouse is almost done in Bolton, ON (outside of Toronto). Should it be added to the list?

http://www.caledonenterprise.com/news-story/4730527-interactive-20-facts-about-the-canadian-tire-development/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.117.116.36 (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are we using idiotically nebulous terms like 'largest' instead of

[edit]

more descriptive terms like Most Voluminous. "largest" would be okay in the simple english wiki but not this one

206.193.249.64 (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because the article (as it currently stands) actually gives three separate lists, only one of which has anything to do with volume. For that reason, I'm taking the terms "this list" and "most voluminous" out of the title paragraph that refers to the article body as a whole, including all three lists. JudahH (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chengdu Global Center, World's largest building by floor area not yet included

[edit]

http://www.reddit.com/r/ArchitecturePorn/comments/1eyxzw/worlds_largest_building_chengdu_global_center/

Somebody needs to add this to the top of the lists, as it is largely complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.161.182.117 (talk) 01:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was wondering why New South China mall was excluded with a total of 892,000 square meters. Is it just because it's tragically empty and a massive boondoggle? --72.207.121.2 (talk) 23:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Buildings 9001 & 3001 at Tinker AFB

[edit]

It would appear that two buildings on Tinker AFB qualify for inclusion in this list, Building 9001 at 330,000 m2 (though this may be the combined size of the old assembly building and the adjoining paint facility) and Building 3001 at 120,000 m2. Building 9001 is the former General Motors Oklahoma City Assembly plant so I would assume that many other auto plants would also qualify for inclusion. Willow Run comes immediately to mind but I don't know how much of the old plant still exists. --SEWalk (talk) 05:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Container Freight Station

[edit]

About.com claims [1] that the Container Freight Station in Hong Kong has seven million square feet of space, but I haven't found much other reference to it. There's some reference elsewhere to the new Hong Kong airport being one of the biggest structures in the world, but I'm not sure about that either (one of the old Berlin airports is huge, though, either Tempelhof International Airport or Tegel International Airport). Probably don't rank first, but probably worth mentioning User:Mulad (talk) 12:51, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

Largest by area

[edit]

The article says the Boeing building is the largest by volume, and that the Pentagon is the largest office building by area. Is the Boeing building the largest overall by area, as well? If not, what is? By looking at their images on Google maps, it looks like the Pentagon could easily fit inside the Boeing building.

The Everett factory is located at 47.9264265,-122.2707354. The floor area listed does not include office blocks and mezzanines within the factory (another ~250-300k ft^2 minimum), merely the main factory floor. A recent addition to the factory (AKA 40-27) brings the area up to ~4.5M ft^2 or 420,000 m^2 (per google maps tool). The roof height of that section is the same as the factory, so the volume would be adjusted similarly. 130.76.24.20 (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it's not entirely clear in the phrasing right now: when measuring the Pentagon's area, does it count the area of the ground covered, or the total area of all floors in the building?

Since when is the Great Wall of China a building?75.16.73.21 01:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't K-25, Oak Ridge, TN USA be included? It is half a mile long and over 1000 feet wide and is has more area under a single roof then the pentagon. 87.177.1.197 (talk) 18:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For that matter, both the Aalsmeer Flower Auction building in the Netherlands and The Venetian in Macau are listed on this page as the largest in usable floor space. 128.253.240.145 01:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the McCoy bldg in Columbus Ohio? The wiki page doesn't list volume, (which seems a strange and arbitrary measurement,) but it does list square feet at 2 million. McCoy Building 174.126.29.222 (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Largest by length

[edit]

The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center is 3.2 kilometers (2.0 miles) long. The Wikipedia entry says "The above-ground klystron gallery atop the beamline is the longest building in the United States." It might be interesting to add a section covering the world's longest buildings.

There's a contradiction in the article on this point. It says the Great Wall of China is the largest building in the world by footprint. Well, if it counts as a "building" for determining footprint, it's a heck of a lot longer than 3.2km as well. The article should clarify the definition of "building" and either count the Great Wall or not. PubliusFL 03:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

[edit]

There should be a more precise definition of what is a building and what is several buildings. For example, Coeur Défense in Paris has the same floor level as the Palace of Parliament in Bucharest. But its shape is very particular (several towers on a common 3-level basement). So does it qualify as the largest European building (on par with the Palace of Parliament)? (see photos at http://www.viguier.com (20 Projets -> Chronology -> 1992) or here). Thbz 05:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't the largest in Europe anyway as the Alsmeer Flower Auction is in Europe too and much larger. But if the share the same basement I think they should be counted as one building and added to the list. -- H005 23:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Palace of Parliament

[edit]

The ranking of the Romanian People's Palace is highly suspect. Many buildings are larger, both by floor space and by volume. Romanians consistently boast that the building is one of the largest in the world, but various research I've done puts it fairly far down the list. I don't have the figures in front of me (nor do I have time to re-research at the moment), but some of the contenders that are not listed in this article include some mega-malls and some of the new tallest-in-the-world buildings in Asia. The Great Pyramid of Cholula, Mexico, has a volume more than nine times the size, according to thefreedictionary.com. There are also larger train stations and airports. However, the "fact" that the People's Palace is one of three buildings visible from space/ well, one square meter smaller than the Pentagon/ well, one of the largest buildings in the world/ well, maybe one of the largest office buildings/ well, at least one of the largest in Europe is deeply embedded within the Romanian national discourse.

Whether it is the heaviest building is a different question, and one on which I have no information. However, any claims about its size relative to other buildings should be considered suspect pending further research. Malangali 17:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about this factory? The "Volkswagenwerk Kassel"in Germany (Volkswagen Factory). Look on the aerial picture you will be able to see this from space too: 4 halls of 550 meters lenght which are connected by a large 1.2 kilometers long front - shouldn't this count as one building?

http://www.wikimapia.org/#lat=51.257913&lon=9.433844&z=16&l=5&m=a&v=2

here you can see the front http://www.hr-online.de/website/rubriken/nachrichten/index.jsp?rubrik=11416&key=standard_document_5447588&lugal=1&ibp=0 this article says the first 3 (of the 4) halls have 135,000, 140,000 and 120,000 square meters (together 395,000 square meters + the not listed hall 4 with estimated 120,000 and the 1.2 meters long front building would result in at least 515,000 square meters floor area and rank 9 of the buildings by largest floor area.) http://regiowiki.hna.de/Ansiedlung_des_Volkswagen-Zweigwerkes you can find a map of the area here: http://www.vw-personal.de/www/de/arbeiten/standorte/kassel/ihr_weg_zu_vw_in_kassel.html

german wikipedia article: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagenwerk_Kassel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.75.79.20 (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Wooden Structure in the World

[edit]

Kirkland Air Force Base in New Mexico claims to have the largest wooden structure in the world. The structure in the Trestle for testing aircraft for EMP. There isn't much information on the web about it, but I found a claim at http://cryptome.quintessenz.at/mirror/6odd-eyeball.htm. Kaiser9111 16:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Tacoma Dome in Tacoma, WA, USA "is 530 feet in diameter and 152 feet tall." according to their official website: http://www.tacomadome.org/history.aspx I believe that is larger than the Tōdai-ji which is listed here as the largest wooden structure in the world. --Neemund (talk) 08:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The airship hangar at Tillamook, Oregon has about 28,000 square meters of floor space making it about a third larger than the Tacoma dome and about ten times the size of the Great Buddha Hall. I believe the airship hangars at Tustin, California are of similar dimensions to Tillamook. They stand a thousand feet long, nearly 300 feet wide and nearly 200 feet tall, and inside it's all clear space. They are clearly buildings--they have roofs and walls and are completely enclosed from the elements--and while they use metal fasteners they are of the sort of construction that most people think of as "wooden" so I can't think of a reason why one of them should not be listed as the largest wooden building. 70.172.201.34 (talk) 02:14, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded on the Tillamook hanger, it's a wood building - they built the hanger during WWII when they had to use metal for other things. According to this: http://www.tillamookair.com/html/bldg.html - it's 205,824 sqft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.88.40 (talk) 07:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Todai-ji. Whatever the largest wooden building is - it's certainly not that. Hotel Del Coronado may be the largest I can find, though the hotel itself doesn't seem to boast of it. A couple sites say it has just under a million square feet of space - http://www.timesharepages.com/finance/hotel-del-coronado-gets-extension-on-mortgage-repayment/ Of course, it really depends what your metric is for "largest"... is it cubic feet of space occupied? Is it the square feet of the structure's base footprint? Or is it the square feet of total floorspace? (in which case multi-floored buildings have an edge over a big hollow hangar). 66.167.106.217 (talk) 02:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of world's largest domes

[edit]

Permit me to comment on the construction of the Mosta Dome. No, it was not built by the British Empire! What's the source of this information? The British Empire, did not build any catholic church in Malta Maltesedog 16:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

btn

[edit]

bnt is like the news but it is beter \ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.49.205.59 (talk) 09:28, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Special Catagories table

[edit]

The special catagories section is getting messy as people keep adding new catagories, I propose to put a table there instead of the list as I think it would clear it up nicely. Ive started a table here to see if it will go ok. If anyone opposes this idea or would like to add or change the table in any way, please feel free to discuss it here.

Type of building Name Location Size
Largest Church Basilica of Our Lady of Peace of Yamoussoukro Yamoussoukro, Côte d'Ivoire 30,000 m² (323,000 sq ft
Largest Palace Forbidden City Beijing, China 720,000m² (7.75 million sq ft)
Largest Airport King Fahd International Airport Dammam, Saudi Arabia 780 km² (301 sq miles)

Cstubbies (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry but I thought we're talking about the largest buildings, not area covered of the airport. Very misleading. 58.147.46.115 (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing Airport Termnal 3

[edit]

The building area is 986,000 sq m, height is 45m, so the volume should be 44 million cubic m. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.10.40 (talk) 22:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would somebody with greater skills than I possess update the site to show that the new Terminal 3 at the Beijing International Airport, due to open Feb 29, 2008, is now, I believe, the largest building coming in at 1.3 million m2 or 14 million ft2. Please see http://www.fosterandpartners.com/News/328/Default.aspx 68.198.49.161 (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • After checking the article and some of the pictures I think the terminal is made up of three or maybe four seperate buildings. In the Foster and partners article it suggests 1.3 million sq meters of floor space 'mostly under one roof'. I'm confident that one or two of these buildings will definately belong on the list, we just need to find find a reliable source that states the size of each building.CStubbies 17:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a picture showing the layout of the terminal[2]. It cleary shows at least three seperate buildings. If they are connected by a basement of some sort it could be an exception but until it is proven by a reliable source, it shouldnt be on the listCStubbies 18:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steel Mills

[edit]

Modern steel mills usually keep caster and rolling train under one roof to avoid reheating of the slab before rolling. Some of them reach 1500m and more in length, about 300m in width and 30m in height, thus covering more area and space than most of the listed buildings, if not all. I know of two mills of this size currently under construction in Magnitogorsk and Nischni Nowgorod, 8 mills of the same type (5000 mm plate mill) already exist in Japan and Germany. Maybe we should take these buildings into account, too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Käptn Weltall (talkcontribs) 09:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Largest usable space

[edit]

There may be some redundancy in the section between the text and the table. Other opinions would be welcome. Thanks. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 19:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The section should explain what is meant by "usable" space. Do people build buildings with large amounts of unusable space? Is floor area or volume the important measure? Does it refer to the space within a single "room"? Can there be supporting columns to hold up the roof? I am not sure why the McDermott building is mentioned in the text. If user 167.24.104.150 is right, I would expect to see it in the "Largest area" list. JonH (talk) 10:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is terrible: "largest amount of usable space". Clearly what is intended is, "Largest single usable space" 63.145.34.130 (talk) 02:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
thanks! always great to have to go to the talk page to understand the main page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.68.231 (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Changed the floor area to reflect the building and not the covered parking at the facility raising the "rank" from 29 to 26. Eagletennis (talk) 02:58, 2 May 2010(UTC)
So, what's the answer here? Is this supposed to mean "largest volume of a single room" or "largest floor area of a single room" or something else? It needs to be fixed. ColinClark (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ADD TO LARGEST BUILDING LIST

[edit]

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION 9800 FREDERICKSBURG ROAD SAN ANTONIO TX 78288

THE MCDERMOTT BUILDING IS OVER 4 MILLION SF —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.24.24.150 (talk) 22:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=9800+fredericksburg+rd,+san+antonio+tx+&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=56.724997,106.875&safe=on&ie=UTF8&ll=29.535659,-98.57661&spn=0.015421,0.026093&t=h&z=15 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.24.104.150 (talk) 21:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Table messed up

[edit]

During the various edit wars that seem to affect this page, Aalsmeer has disappeared from the table altogether -- by all accounts, it needs to be restored. I'd do it myself but I'm not confident enough about the topic area. Gusworld (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How detailed should the list of Special Categories be?

[edit]

The list of Special Categories can easily be enlarged a lot of. It is possible to make very specific categories and thus getting hundreds of them. I personally think we could keep adding categories until it starts to "look silly". After that we can simply lift the list of Special Categories out to a separate page and only leave say the 10 most important or so.

Does anyone have an opinion on if we should keep adding categories or if we should keep an upper limit?

Does anyone object to me adding the category "Largest Public Toilet Complex"? (It is Porcelain Palace in Chongqing by the way) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.227.58.24 (talk) 09:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shahin-e-iqbal (talk) 16:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC)== Angkor Wat is not that large == Angkor Wat is listed as having floor area of 1,000,000 m². The main temple is only about 250 m times 150 m and is only in one level. That would give it a floor area of roughly 37,500 m². The entire compounds it probably around 1,000,000 m² but most of that is forest or open spaces. Check out the article about Angkor Wat and you'll see that I'm right. Since this article is about the largest buildings I don't think forests and lawns should be included. Just like the parking lot are not included when you determine the size of a shopping mall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.227.58.24 (talk) 09:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you're going to include open space in these rankings, Angkor Wat may not be the largest religious building. The figures in the article on Angkor Wat say its outer wall encloses only 820,000 square meters, which is much less than the million square meters given here. If Angkor Wat is going to stay in this position, it needs a citation. A. Parrot (talk) 23:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced it by the Masjid al-Haram in Mecca becasue the mosque covers more than 4,000,000 sqr m of useable area and is also the most sacred site for the muslims (hence a religious site).Shahin-e-Iqbal (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Largest by volume?

[edit]

Shouldn't there also be a list of the largest buildings where the definition is by volume rather than by floor area?

Large Hadron Collider

[edit]

In my opinion Large Hadron Collider should be included on this page (unless there is a larger particle accelerator somewhere). Does anyone object to me adding the category "Largest Particle Accelerator" or "Largest Circular Building" or "Largest Research Building"? One problem is of course that it is mostly housed in a tunnel and not in a building. Does anyone have an idea of a way to include LHC without violating the intent with the article?

As a large tunnel, it belongs (and is already listed in) in List of longest tunnels in the world, not here... Jpatokal (talk) 09:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHY was the Taipei 101 not in the list

[edit]

It ranks in at like 20 out of 32 and is also very tall, not just some large warehouse. It has over 400,000 square meters. Daniel Christensen (talk) 22:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Year of construction/completion?

[edit]

Just out of curiosity, would it be possible to add to the tables when these structures were built or completed? It's one particular piece of info I was looking for in reading this article and it's noticeably absent. Many of these buildings were the largest in the world in their category at some point before being superceded by the next one, so adding one column giving simple chronological info I think would be very relevant.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Historical largest buildings

[edit]

I believe that there should be a list of historical largest buildings by floor area and/or that dates of construction should be included in the charts to give readers a time line type reference. I believe that this may also be justified through the Centennial Exposition Article for the 1876 World's Fair which states that the main exhibition building was the largest in the world at the time. Eagletennis(talk) 02:46, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of shopping malls should be split

[edit]

I suggest we split the list of shopping malls to its own article. It doesn't make since that it's the only category here with a full list instead of just adding the biggest to the special categories section. I looked into the history and found that it did have its own article a while ago, and I have no idea what could be the rationale behind the merge. I'll keep the status quo for now to see if anyone has any complaints. -- Orionisttalk 08:12, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

K-25

[edit]

I thought about removing K-25 from the list, but decided to open it for discussion first. Demolition of K-25 began in 2008 and is slated for completion in 2011 as noted here Large sections of the building are completely gone. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion page has been split

[edit]
PLEASE NOTE:
Follwoing the split of the shopping malls section back to its own article: List of largest shopping malls in the world, discussion threads related to that list has also been moved to that article`s discussion page: Talk:List of largest shopping malls in the world.

Target distro center

[edit]

Looks like the data for floor space and volume are a little off. Can someone confirm? Matttoothman (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Serious Cleanup Needed

[edit]

Many of the "buildings" in the list are a complex of several buildings, including the "Jakarta Central Park" and the Towers in Saudi Arabia. By that standard, Rockefeller Center would be the "largest building" in the world, and we would have to include the many buildings of the new World Trade Center too, once they were done. When a building is defined as a single building under a single roof, as much as a quarter of the list could be removed. -- 24.215.246.114 (talk) 21:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warren G. Magnuson Health Sciences Building

[edit]

The Starbucks Center page lists that it is the largest building in Seattle by floor space, with a reliable source at the local major newspapers website, where as the Warren G. Magnuson Health Sciences Building lists that it is 3 times larger, although its source is only a blog entry. I do not think that is a verifiable source, or one of the pages is wrong.76.28.251.236 (talk) 17:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 I concur, removing for now.Tsutomu (talk) 06:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of largest airport terminals in the world

[edit]

If there exists a list of the largest shopping malls in the world, then why isn't there a list of largest airport terminals in the world? In the "List of largest buildings in the world" article, twelve airport terminals are listed under the section titled "largest floor space":

  • Dubai International Airport Termimal 3
  • Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3
  • Hong Kong International Airport Terminal 1
  • Suvarnabhumi Airport Terminal 1
  • Mexico City International Airport Terminal 1
  • Barcelona Airport Terminal 1
  • Indira Gandhi International Airport Terminal 3
  • Incheon International Airport Terminal 1
  • Madrid Barajas Airport Terminal 1
  • Toronto Pearson International Airport Terminal 1
  • Soekarno–Hatta International Airport Terminal 3
  • Narita International Airport Terminal 1
  • Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 3

At various other airports, other terminals with a floor area of at least a million sq ft are likely to exist. So, can a plan to spin-off the airport terminals into their own list be considered or should the large airport terminals remain in this article? Jim856796 (talk) 21:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buildings that need to be added

[edit]

The Dubai Pearl is larger than any building on this list. According to wikipedia, it is 1.85 million square meters, and some estimates take it as far as 20 million square feet. The structure is under construction and even though it has a heigh of 984 feet, it appears to be longer than it is tall.

Another canidate for this list would be the Orange County Convention Center, which contains 7,000,000 square feet of enclosed space. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jag140 (talkcontribs) 03:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Jag140 GigaTexas is nearly 11M s.f. with a 500,000 s.f. expansion underway now. 12.49.164.41 (talk) 01:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just this list, which only covers Ford factories, has already several buildings with a larger footprint/floor area than the buildings listed. I don't believe for a second that this article is complete.--193.53.37.25 (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be wary of that list by Ford as their claimed plant size equals their claimed site size for at least the top two. That implies the building size could well be much smaller. --Skytopia (talk) 10:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CCTV

[edit]

Why isn't the CCTV Headquarters on this page? It has a floor area of 389,079m^2. (See http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=8094)

Proposed split

[edit]

I think this article should be split in two. One article for the largest buildings by volume, and one for the largest buildings by floor space. This talk page is getting very confusing. When someone suggests adding a new building, it is not always clear which list they want to add the building to. I would not be confident enough to split the page myself so I am hoping that somebody else could do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.111.239 (talk) 09:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IKEA

[edit]

I saw that the warehouse of IKEA in Piacenza (Italy) has a footprint of 157,000 m2 (there are 2 different working areas, but in an only one building) and it is long about 1 km, so i think that it could be inserted in the statistic. Can anyone check and eventually insert it inside the page? --TM17 08:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Another large footprint

[edit]

Originally posted at Help:Introduction to referencing/3 -- John of Reading (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Ralph Blake. I am currently working for Jacobs Engineering as a Quality Control Inspector contracted to the US Army Corps of Engineering for the project described in the article that the link below will show. The building that I am working on is not included in your list of building in the world having the largest footprints. The attached article documents the building's (Building 2001 at the DLA facility in New Cumberland, Pa 17070) immense size and should be added to you list of the 35 buildings with the largest foot print.

Thank You, Ralph Blake

http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Media/NewsStories/tabid/10435/Article/9809/corps-and-dla-distribution-officials-team-together-on-a-huge-roof-replacement-p.aspx

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.194.194.252 (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2013‎

London Millenium Dome

[edit]

I'm surprised not to see the Millenium Dome not listed here. Its diameter is 365m making the notional space 104,634m2 and height 52m making the volume 2.794 million m3. I haven't added it yet as there may have been objections that it is a temporary structure. But it was originally an exhibition hall and now houses permanent entertainment facilities. Clearly its life will not be as long as some other structures but does that disbar it? Chris55 (talk) 10:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is the millenium dome actually a proper building? I have never been in it but I always believed that it was a large marquee over several smaller buildings. If it is only that then it is the buildings inside that should count, not the entire dome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.64.202 (talk) 12:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Skechers Distribution Warehouse

[edit]

Reported as: 2,900 feet long, 700 feet wide, 1.82 million sq. ft. floor space/footprint, 81 million cubic feet volume. Rancho Belago, CA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.242.178 (talk) 05:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAP/Old Navy has a large distribution warehouse that is larger than the Target one listed, it is 2.4 million square feet. (222,960-sq.-m) http://www.siteselection.com/issues/2003/mar/p146/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.42.208.182 (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Deere North American Parts Distribution Center

[edit]

The John Deere North American Parts Distribution Center in Milan, IL, USA (warehouse) should be added to the largest footprint section. 2,600,000+ sq ft (241,548 sq m) of floor space, one level.

Article

Map — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.54.36.245 (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This one came to mind for me, as well! In fact, there are several large motor vehicle spare parts warehouses globally that should also be listed here. I will add some once I find some publicly available data (I know of data for all these buildings, but it's proprietary). --BCC (talk) 22:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this been removed from the page? Multiple sources cite it as 2.65 million square feet. Recent article here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.43.65.245 (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Willow Run bomber plant

[edit]

The Willow Run bomber plant in Michigan seems to be large enough to be on this list, if it's still around? [3] -- Beland (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/incheon/
    Triggered by \bairport-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't there a list of the most massive man made structures? We seem to have everything else???

[edit]

How about a list of man made structures over 5 million tones??? or 5.5 million tones?

It is a very interesting statistic and there seems to be no information on it.

The Giza Pyramid is estimated to be 5.9 million tonnes.

Is there any structure more massive, either a building or a dam?

What about the sulfur step pyramids of Alberta Canada? Together there mass is 8.9 million tones, but the biggest might only be about 5 million tones? http://williamahuston.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-great-sulfur-pyramids-of-alberta.html

Oh it looks like dams can be more massive than pyramids, but not by much:

        The hoover Dam weights about 6.6 million tonnes, but that is the only dam I can find.

http://www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/faqs/damfaqs.html

I found a little more information on some huge sky scrapers, it looks like reasonable estimates and you can see how much less massive skyscrapers are, but it might be interesting to have them in the list for comparison?:

          Taipei 101 weighs in at a staggering 700,000,000 kg or 771,000 tonnes
          World Trade Center 1 or 2 estimated to 500,000,000 kg or 551,115 tonnes
          Empire State Building, NYC = 365,000,000 kg or 402,303 tonnes

I got this info at this forum: http://www.physforum.com/What-was-the-weight-of-a-WTC-Tower_4299.html

Any ideas how to get more of this kind of information? It should just be a simple calculation for most man made objects like dams etc.

Thanks Xacobi (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should this one be included ?

[edit]

Footprint: 613.800 m²

it´s a car manufacturing in Brazil.

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_Betim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.252.40.64 (talk) 19:54, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LM Aero Factory should be added to the list

[edit]

Should the Lockheed Martin Aeronautics F-35 assembly building at AF base #4 be included in this list? It's a factory similar in size to the Boeing Everett Factory. I'm not sure of the exact size, but on a satellite map, it looks to be about 300x5000 = 1,500,000 ft^2.

http://www.epa.gov/region6/6sf/pdffiles/afp4-tx.pdf https://www.google.com/maps/place/Lockheed+Martin+Aeronautics+Company/@32.7743125,-97.4486982,1078m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x864e0cb124cc5f59:0x3e4673f24c7c844!6m1!1e1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iknowless (talkcontribs) 14:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Gigafactory

[edit]

Should this even be listed? It's not finished, let alone enclosed the claimed footprint. The current footprint won't even get it on the list. 130.76.24.20 (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to one source I follow, the total usable area of Giga Texas will be over 800,000 square meters, when completed.War (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@War GigaTexas is over 10,000,000 s.f. with an 500,000 s.f. expansion underway now. It is the second largest building in the world, and MAY be the largest after the expansion. 12.49.164.41 (talk) 01:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate Article

[edit]

There is a lot of buildings that are missing from this page and a lot of buildings that should not be on this page because they are larger.

Here is just a few that I can think of from the top of my head in the Toronto area alone in terms of footprint.

1: GM plant in Oshawa – approx. 10 million sq. ft. https://www.google.com/maps/place/700+Park+Rd+S,+Oshawa,+ON+L1J+4K1,+Canada/@43.8671023,-78.8752725,2274m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x89d51d6ad8f11bc5:0xde9170dd165bfa6f!8m2!3d43.8742106!4d-78.8640983

2. Chrysler plant in Windsor – approx. 4 million sq. ft. https://www.google.ca/maps/place/2199+Chrysler+Center,+Windsor,+ON+N8W+3Y3/@42.2949747,-82.9846236,16z/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x883b2b8236847971:0x7dfe70125c2df9b3

3. Toyota plant in Cambridge – approx. 3 million sq. ft. https://www.google.ca/maps/place/1055+Fountain+St+N,+Cambridge,+ON+N3H+4R7/@43.4185822,-80.3669738,15z/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x882b8a2ecae7a921:0x5a6812f8d733626b

4. Chrysler plant in Brampton – approx. 3 million sq. ft. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Fiat+Chrysler+Automobiles,+Brampton+Assembly+Plant/@43.7503487,-79.7196626,1139m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0xc66cd72cd8a0ed38!8m2!3d43.751265!4d-79.7166681

5. Canadian Tire Distribution Centre Bolton (1.5 million sq. ft.) https://www.google.ca/maps/place/13226+Coleraine+Dr,+Bolton,+ON+L7E+3B2/@43.8635297,-79.7422873,761m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x882b1f541f1c3cf9:0xb730683d7ae6a6f3!2sCanadian+Tire+Bolton+Distribution+Centre+(Construction+Entrance)!3b1!8m2!3d43.8670212!4d-79.7443532!3m4!1s0x882b1f5561941641:0x394b06e6fa75a47e!8m2!3d43.8619496!4d-79.737547?hl=en

6. Canadian Tire Distribution Centre Coteau-du-Lac (1.5 million sq. ft.) https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Canadian+Tire+Distribution+Center/@45.3023251,-74.2064831,743m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0xdd74ad57ce036fd5!8m2!3d45.3039392!4d-74.207325?hl=en

I think that the list should be limited to a smaller number of buildings in order to facilitate the monitoring of their accuracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrieldenis85 (talkcontribs) 22:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Fremont factory not one big building.

[edit]

The article currently lists Tesla's Fremont facility as #1 at 530,000 m2. That may be the total floor area of all the buildings, but no one building is that big.[4] There are roads between some of the buildings. Ford's River Rouge plant has 1.6 million square meters, but not in one building. John Nagle (talk) 02:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

American Greetings

[edit]

American Greetings Corp. operates a distribution center in Osceola, AR that is 2,600,000 Sq Ft. This building should certainly be on the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.163.2.56 (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon Fulfillment Centers

[edit]

Amazon has a whole series of Fulfillment Centers in various locations with sizes ranging upwards from 1.2 million square feet, which is larger than the bottom entires in the list. Some of the larger missing entries may push this size of building off the bottom of the list, however, depending on how large the list is meant to be. 45.72.231.62 (talk) 13:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of largest buildings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on List of largest buildings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of largest buildings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are these lists exhaustive?

[edit]

If not, above what cutoffs are they believed to be exhaustive? Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 02:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== Inconsistency intro and table: Largest building by area In the introduction, it is stated "The Aalsmeer Flower Auction Building in Aalsmeer, Netherlands is the largest building in area footprint". In the table however, the AvtoVAZ main assembly building has a way higher footprint. Which of these two is correct? Erwin (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Residential buildling

[edit]

I would like to see List_of_largest_buildings#Special_categories including Residential building.--Wyn.junior (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stand alone buildings here

[edit]

Ciputra World Surabaya is an Awesome building complex. There should be a list for building complexes also. I like knowing what standalone buildings are the biggest--Wyn.junior (talk) 19:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify "This list of special categories includes a variety of buildings which are the largest of their type."

[edit]

What does "largest" mean? Largest volume, largest area, tallest, etc.?47.139.40.57 (talk) 19:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfsburg Volkswagen Factory

[edit]

Is the Wolfsburg Volkswagen Plant at 70 million sq ft a single building? Perhaps some more missed buildings can be found in [5] Note that that indicates "Aalsmeer Flower Auction building is the largest building in the world in terms of its real estate space: It covers a gigantic 518,000 m²" so maybe there are lots of buildings making up Wolfsburg Volkswagen Factory. crandles (talk) 10:32, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I see hall 12 is included so presumably it isn't one building. crandles (talk) 13:42, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AvtoVAZ main assembly building

[edit]
  • AvtoVAZ main assembly building length looks dubious to me. Looks like it includes a building across a road which I think shouldn't be included even though there is a cover over the road joining the buildings. crandles (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla Gigafactory 3

[edit]

The source listed for Gigafactory 3's footprint is in chinese, but from the google translate it appears that the 864,885 sq m figure is referring to the total plot of land, not the building itself. I haven't found a good source for actual footprint, but a quick look on Google Earth suggests 150,000 sq meters or less at the moment. Smt42 (talk) 23:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Bus Terminal

[edit]

I'm curious what criteria is used to determine the largest bus terminal - by square meters - İstanbul Esenler Otogar is 12,000 sqmt bigger (242,000 square meters), but perhaps that's not the criteria in this case?

This is a source (in Turkish) for the size, and scope of Esenler Otogar: http://emlakansiklopedisi.com/wiki/esenler-otogari

Also when searching for the largest bus terminal online, a bus depot in Dehli comes up at 243,000 sq mt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Park_Bus_Depot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Francis Burchard (talkcontribs) 20:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

very incomplete volume list

[edit]

The volume part is so much incomplete. I think any of the malls from an article about malls would be above one million cubic meters! If it has 100,000 square meters of leasable space, it is probably above 1,000,000 cubic meters. For example Westfield Chodov with 102k square meters has volume of 1,370k cubic meters. The largest floor area building must have around 11,7 million cubic meters, based on its dimensions (100*400*500 with some irregularities). Also many skyscrapers would have a volume above million cubic meters ( DragonWikipedist (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abral Al Bait one building?

[edit]

Or is to made of individual skyscrapers? DragonWikipedist (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frankfurt Airport Terminal 3

[edit]

According to https://www.fraport.com/en/business-partner/terminal-3/facts-figures.html Terminal 3 at Frankfurt Airport should be included once it's finished. According to the source, the new Terminal will have a footprint of 149,000m2 and a total floor area of 403,000 m2. For the moment, its still under construction and will open in 2023. Tyset (talk) 22:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Largest structure

[edit]

The Great Wall of China (named before on this talk page before) were linked as the largest structure ever built. But what about the Walls of Benin, which states: "In all, they are four times longer than the Great Wall of China" under the header "Description". Cycn (talk) 16:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bielefeld University missing

[edit]

I've noticed that the University of Bielefeld is not mentioned in this list, even though according to their Website, News Articles and Wikipedia Page the building is about 154,000m². Hldmylqr (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The LArgest PLace in my area.

[edit]

Ok, so there is a building in my Town called "K-MART Distribution Center", where it is a distribution center Some some place called "K-MArt". It has an area of 2,102,378 ft² (I used Google Maps For that). The area in Square meters is 195,317 m². Should that be added to the list, even tho it has no wikipedia article, should that be on the list still? It belongs on one of the largest buildings.

Eaaaaugh (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Footprint Measurement

[edit]

I'm not sure why people have tried to use Google Maps to approximate the surface area? That will be incredibly inaccurate.

What you should do is use OpenStreetMap to trace the outline of the building you are interested in. If it is already there, then you don't have to do anything. Then, download the shapefile of the single building using something like Overpass Turbo. Finally, use any GIS software (maybe QGIS) or just use a Python function to calculate the area of the building. This will actually be accurate, rather than just approximating.

--Karsonkevin2 (talk) 17:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added all the buildings for Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. My methodology was to download an extract of the entire shape from http://download.geofabrik.de/north-america/us.html. Then, using QGIS calculate the area of every building in the state. From there, I manually checked every building with over 66,000 sq meters to verify the extent. The shapefile includes the OSM iD, so you just have to replace something like this with the appropriate id to check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422584100. Some buildings are vandalism, they don't actually exist. Other buildings are just mapped very inaccurately and need to be refined to get the actual area. I checked buildings down to 2/3 * 100,000 since some buildings might be broken up into parts. For instance, a mall might be mapped as a large central area, but then the outer facing shops might have separate areas. For these buildings, I resorted to my previous strategy of using Overpass Turbo to download all the buildings, calculate the area in QGIS, and then added together the relevant areas.

--Karsonkevin2 (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the rates of IA, IL, WI, MN, MO, WY, NE, MN the US will have 1,200 buildings over 100k sq meters. I think the threshold for being included in the list will need to be raised. Assuming the same occurrence of large buildings globally, there would be about 28,000 buildings over 100k sq meters

--Karsonkevin2 (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, I guess it's technically original research but not too unreasonable. I've increased the cutoff to 150k m2. Reywas92Talk 16:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of sticking all the buildings I find into this article, I am going to draft them into here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:List_of_Largest_Building_in_the_US#List_of_Largest_Buildings_by_Footprints. This list will be comprehensive for the US. Once I finish it, I will copy them over to this article. --Karsonkevin2 (talk) 21:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Google Maps nor Open Street Maps should be used here. Using them violates WP:OR. Find a valid citation that states the data or the entry will have to go bye bye. War (talk) 05:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest buildings in the United States. Karsonkevin2 now acknowledges there that the content of that article is WP:OR, and suggests that similar issues can be found here. [6] AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Older historical large buildings

[edit]

I belive it would be appreciated to have older, historically important buildings, in the list. As a comparision. Most of the one listed are factories... and how frequently do real people get to see these?

Berlin Tempelhof Airport was for a long time one of the largest buildings, and many people can still see it, easily. It would be interesting to see its size, as a comparision. Pyramids in Egypt... Colosseum... Tower of London, Versailles palace. Empire State builinding, Chrysler building, Madison Sq Gardens, Grand Central Stn, Union station... Building that where impressive, for a long time after being build. To compare current large places, with older large places.

It would probably be best to list such buildings separately, so they do not interfere with the modern list. Then K-25 could go into that list. No, I have no time, just the interest, so I am not going to do anything. --Janwikifoto (talk) 11:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. Not that I think it would hurt as long as it can be written with reliable sources. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2022

[edit]

the pyarmid's of giza are still ranked number 12 for the largest building's in the world and The Great Pyramid of Cholula, are still racked number 11 today for the largest building in the world by volume 199.197.91.113 (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2022

[edit]

the Quetzalcóatl Pyramid is still the is still the 7th largest building in the world which has a volume of 4.45M^3. but there probably just for tourist. but the Quetzalcoatl pyramids isn't on the list for this wikipedia page and the publishers forgot the Quetzalcoatl pyramids. [1]</ref> 199.197.99.167 (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Here, building refers to the single structures that are suitable for continuous human occupancy. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Inaccuracies protected?

[edit]

Haven't looked at wikipedia in a long time and this is reminding me why. This is full of error, yet is locked to prevent correction. The "FCA World Headquarters and ..." never changed names, it's now a Stellantis engineering center but remains named, as always, the Chrysler Technology Center - and has been over 5.4 million sqft since the early 00s when the Wind tunnel was added. The Renaissance Center is not one building, it was originally 5 connected by an atrium, and two more were lumped with it across a parking lot. The Tesla Austin Giga Factory is not 8 million sqft. According to state records, numerous articles, and recent Tesla promotions for an upcoming job fair, it is 4.3 million sqft. I have to assume everything else in here is just as messed up. Being so inaccurate, and with edits disallowed, this should be a nomination for deletion.

The 4.3 million sqft is the footprint area, as is easily measured on Google Earth. I've added that to the Footprint section; it wasn't there already because it's still under construction. The 8 million sqft is in fact what this source says, and is refering to floor area, the section it was in. The FCA name has been updated. Five of the towers of the Renaissance Center are in fact connected so it will stay. Thanks for whining!
umm, that size for the ren cen includes all 7 towers - two of which are detached.
The size here is the sum of the five connected tower and podium structure listed at Renaissance_Center#Technical_details_and_tenants. Reywas92Talk 01:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of largest buildings in the United States nominated for deletion

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest buildings in the United States. Any discussion as to whether the entries in that article are WP:OR (they certainly seem to me to be, though I created the AfD discussion on behalf of an IP) will no doubt also be relevant here, since some of the entries in this list seem to be based on the same debatable sourcing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Largest buildings in the world

[edit]

You didn`t include the pyramids of Giza for largest building`s in the world by volume. It has a volume of 2,300,000m^3 2600:6C44:F7F:4BC0:7886:AAAD:6851:E761 (talk) 01:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]