Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davenies School, Beaconsfield

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:44, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Davenies School, Beaconsfield moved to Davenies (its common name)

Single-sentence substub. Establish notability by the end of the five-day period or delete. Neutrality^talk 05:04, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Delete unless wikipedia wants a short, pointless article for every run of the mill school on the planet. CDThieme 05:14, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools. Verifiable and NPOV. First, preserve knowledge, then expand knowledge. Thanks to Neutrality, I've had no time for adding content today. --Unfocused 05:48, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kappa 05:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Instutional Vanity. Wikipedia isn't a triviabase Gmaxwell 06:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can't you Speedy things like this based on the no-content clause? I mean, this isn't exactly "he was a funny man" stuff, but it's no article. Even a For Sale ad in the freebies of your local paper would be longer than this. Master Thief Garrett 07:31, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Beaconsfield and delete - Skysmith 09:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.JuntungWu 12:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Efficient little crammer, very English. You can practically smell the boiled cabbage and gym shorts. Very pretty. Obvious scope for growth here. I'll add a link to its 2004 Independent Schools Inspectorate report. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this fine little article Lupin 14:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools in wikipedia. --Howrealisreal 14:48, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity. R adiant _* 15:02, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Merge/Consolidate into article on area private schools, or else keep. — RJH 15:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Longhair | Talk 17:03, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools. Inherently notable (expect to be seeing this posted quite a few times). R Calvete 19:49, 2005 May 17 (UTC)
Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 20:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the schoolcruft. Ketsuban has spoken. The debate is over. 21:07, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Bogus (non-policy) nomination - notability is still not a listed deletion criterion - David Gerard 23:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Quale 23:50, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Beaconsfield per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:05, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. WP:POINT gone awry. —RaD Man (talk) 07:43, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Lots of articles start out as mere stubs! Let them grow! Visit Schoolwatch to vote on other schools up for vfd. --Zantastik 18:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Introduce a limit of 3 nominations per day. CalJW 18:44, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Introduce a limit on school articles shorter than 3 sentences, or in this case, shorter than 2 sentences. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:27, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = not notable. NoAccount 03:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.