Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrupp

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:33, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Thrupp

I don't know whether this page is the kind of thing Wiktionary want... If it is, move. If not, delete. Smoddy | Talk 16:53, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete, Neologism. JRM 17:02, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
Delete, it's not really a neologism. Just a joke word that Douglas Adams made up for a book. As much as I like Douglas Adams, this is non-encyclopedic. Rje 17:08, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Ahem. Joke words that Douglas Adams made up for a book would be neologisms. It doesn't actually have to be used or be intended to be used for that. I highly doubt the word is cromulent enough to be in the Wiktionary. JRM 19:48, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

Concur. Edeans 06:08, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, copying more than the odd entry from Meaning of Liff would be a copyvio. --fvw * 17:12, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
Delete, mainly 'cause it's utterly nn. Wyss 19:43, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.