Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supagroup
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Supagroup was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
This is a vanity page, it should be deleted. Edward 12:42, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Seems notable to me. They have a CD selling on Amazon and every other major site. Mdchachi|Talk 14:52, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Hardly vanity. The group is verifiable; it has several albums selling on Amazon and is worthy of note on Wikipedia. Stop wasting our time with the notability game. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 17:42, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep as notable. Here it is discussed in major media in Denver, Detroit and, heck, here they are reviewed in the print Rolling Stone. Samaritan 19:39, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. They've got a lot of Google hits. P Ingerson 19:50, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Supakeep, this was never even a suitable VfD IMO Wyss 23:14, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- weak Keep, weakly notable. --fvw* 23:30, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)
- Keep it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:28, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.