Talk:Technical (vehicle)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Technical (vehicle) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 730 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Technical (vehicle) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 730 days

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Citing sources

The basis for this article seems to be an article on a web site called Bellum.[1] Although the site generally looks good, its article about technicals has an empty "sources" section. It is not good enough to satisfy Wikipedia's requirements for citing sources—it is what Wikipedia refers to as a self-published source, which is not considered reliable or verifiable.

Let's find a better reference. —Michael Z. 2007-07-28 15:17 Z

suggested addition

the re should be a referance to the Ludlow_Massacre and the "death special"

Quotation out of context

“The irregular vehicles were likewise accompanied by a lack of chain of command amongst the Chadians, typical of guerrilla warfare.[citation needed] According to the Time article: "We have no ranks," says Abdul Osman, 21. "We are all combatants, we are all volunteers."[6]”

The quotation is of a soldier speaking about eating arrangements while in the field. The article describes the Chad forces organized in regiments and escadrons, so the statement about lack of chain of command is not supported. Any comments before I remove this passage? —Michael Z. 2008-07-30 17:50 z

I've removed the passage. —Michael Z. 2008-08-14 14:26 z

Chadian conflict section needs help

I understand how it got this way--- but the sequence needs help. The "Great Toyota War" now commonly refers to the very end of the conflict in 1987-1988, but Time Magazine referred to the earlier parts as the "Great Toyota War" in 1984. It's confusing for the section to say that it refers to events in '87 and became so famous that Time named the conflict the Great Toyota War in 1984. OTOH I don't know how to fix it :D 2001:470:4A39:1:0:0:0:A72 (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To add to this, in the introduction, technicals are stated as "mostly helpless against any air support they might see from a proper army." In the Toyota War, Chadian technical cavalry went up against a "proper army" with real air support and won. 64.147.0.194 (talk) 17:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Technical (vehicle" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Technical (vehicle has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Technical (vehicle until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]