User talk:Exabyte
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:Current polls
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam [Spade] 04:13, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
"Automagically" wasn't a typo. See Jargon dictionary. Noel 23:43, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Done.
- PS: Oh, also, people generally reply on the Talk: page of the person who wrote a message to them - that way, someone doesn't have to monitor a whole long list of Talk: pages (one for each person who they are having a "conversation" with. Noel 04:17, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Yo exabyte- about the vitamin b6 page which you have helped with, from the french page it appears there are three forms in fact? you might want to check that out (chem diagrams are the same in every lang). i didn't want to edit it b/c i'm not sure of the reliability of the info, but i thought you might be. my user name is sardino but i can't sign in here.
Walter Rutkowski
[edit]Just an FYI - per WP:POLITICIAN he meets the notability requirement, as he has held state-level office. That's usually sufficient grounds for notability. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, for the reason cited above, and have declined the speedy tag and removed it. You are, of course, welcome to take this article to an articles for deletion process; should you require help with that, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not spam my talk page with spurious warning templates.
[edit]If you wish to discuss an article, please do it on that articles talk page. I suggest you review WP:DTTR, as well as WP:BRD and WP:CONSENSUS. Dlabtot (talk) 18:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
"Califnornia" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Califnornia. Since you had some involvement with the Califnornia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)