Talk:Mungyeong

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Grand Korean Waterway

I'm reluctant to enter information on this here because it is not offically a project as yet. However, if it does happen, it will drastically affect this town. I'm not sure how to fit it in though: Geography, Tourism, Transportation, Economics, etc. Please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaronDierkes (talk • contribs) 03:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i suggest mentioning it as a proposed project that may have a large economic impact on this town from increased transportation and tourism (or something like that). it's one of the new south korean president's top priorities, so it's more than just idle speculation. it seems like a giant version of his Cheonggyecheon project when he was mayor of seoul. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.76.15.52 (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mungyeong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]