Talk:Doctor Who merchandise

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Doctor Who Monster Invasion was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 March 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Doctor Who merchandise. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Doctor Who robots#Handbots|Handbot]] The anchor (#Handbots) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

According to the principle of be bold, I have started this article from material cluttering up Doctor Who spin-offs. Any organisational ideas for this page most welcome! Tim! (talk) 09:24, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

1970's figures

I've fixede the more obivous bits, but it needs clean up from an expert on the subject.(84.65.41.254 18:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Action figures

I tossed an Expand tag into the Action Figures section. I think it's a great idea, but there needs to be discussion about the Dapol releases and earlier Doctor Who action figures. I'd do it myself but I know very little about them. 23skidoo 23:02, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More on toys

This article should have more information about general Doctor Who toys, including the Cyberman voice-changer helmet, which has been named Toy of the Year by the Toy Retailers Association.[1] If anyone has a copy of Howe's Transcendental Toybox, I'm sure it has useful information that could be cited in this article.

There's also some redundancy in the "Product Enterprise" and "Character Options" sections, but I don't really know enough about this aspect of merchandising to reorganize the sections. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 22:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't there Torchwood figures made by a different company? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.149.179 (talk) 03:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abzorbaloff figure rumour

I'm sure I've read somewhere that Peter Kay has denied permission to do an Abzorbaloff figure, can anyone find this (because if it's true the Abzorbaloff figure can be removed from the list of rumoured action figures)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by A wikipedia member with an awful username (talk • contribs) 17:49, February 6, 2007 (UTC)

Prices in what currency?

I'm thinking that the prices in this article are in U.S. dollars. (Seemed a bit strange to me, since I suspect most of these items were made and marketed in the U.K., but whatever.) If this is US$, perhaps that should be made clear (Australia and Canada use the same symbol for their currency). In addition, I'm wondering if the monetary estimates should be dated, since the value of currency changes over time. Accounting4Taste 17:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Doctor Who Boardgame.jpg

Image:Doctor Who Boardgame.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Skycov01.jpg

Image:Skycov01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Destiny of the Doctors.jpg

The image Image:Destiny of the Doctors.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gamebooks

I notice the Make Your Own Adventure books are here (under "gamebooks"), but the Decide Your Destiny books are under New Series Adventures. I think it would make more sense to have them here as well. Daibhid C (talk) 14:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetic board game

There was a magnetic board game as well, involving moving the doctor around with a magnet on a stick under the game board. Daleks would be attracted or repelled depending on the direction taken. Alas I have no name or detailed information, just the memory of having had it.

(user:lkchild 23:00, 6 September 09 (GMT) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.95.155 (talk)

Denys Fisher & Dapol

Those sections need to be heavily rewritten to remove WP:FANCRUFT if the article is going to include them; adding sources would also help. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree but I would also say that section blanking is not helpful. Feel free to add the appropriate tags and/or prune the fancruft. MarnetteD|Talk 19:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate tag has been added at the top of the article. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 07:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. MarnetteD|Talk 15:45, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]