User talk:Feco

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

If I've commented on your talk page, I am already watching it for your reply.
If you've commented on my talk page, please watch this page for my reply.

(You're welcome to crosspost the thread between the talk pages, or request that I reply on your talk page.
Unless specifically requested, I prefer to post where the thread started.)

Feel free to post here.... I just like a clean page. After we're done discussing whatever it is we're discussing, don't expect to find a record here. Cleanliness is allegedly next to Godliness, so I try to keep this clean. Feco

So I've heard rumors that wiki policy requests users keep their TALK pages forever. I'm not sure if that's official policy; I haven't bothered to look, and please don't tell me whether or not it is policy. Ignorance is bliss! My ignorance leads to me cleaning my talk page. A clean talk page is bliss. I get a double-helping of bliss by being ignorant and obsessive. Don't take that away from me unless the cleaning of my talk page really, really, really bothers you.

Wikiproject Finance

Seeing some of your editorial interests, I'd like to invite you to join and help form Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance. --Leifern 20:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. The finance pages at Wikipedia need a lot of work. Finnancier 12:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs

Hi. I was wondering if you could add a description on the image page of what your graphs are showing. Thank you. gren グレン 12:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Odwalla

Hey, I saw you contributed a while ago to Odwalla, so, if you can, could you please spare a wikimoment and come on by to help? Thanks! Intothewoods29 (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Code

nvidia-xconfig: X configuration file generated by nvidia-xconfig
nvidia-xconfig: version 1.0 (buildmeister@builder57) Thu Jul 17 18:39:19 PDT 2008

Section "ServerLayout"

   Identifier     "Layout0"
   Screen      0  "Screen0"
   InputDevice    "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
   InputDevice    "Mouse0" "CorePointer"

EndSection

Section "Files"

   RgbPath         "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"

EndSection

Section "Module"

   Load           "dbe"
   Load           "extmod"
   Load           "type1"
   Load           "freetype"
   Load           "glx"

EndSection

Section "InputDevice"

   # generated from default
   Identifier     "Mouse0"
   Driver         "mouse"
   Option         "Protocol" "auto"
   Option         "Device" "/dev/psaux"
   Option         "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
   Option         "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"

EndSection

Section "InputDevice"

   # generated from default
   Identifier     "Keyboard0"
   Driver         "kbd"

EndSection

Section "Monitor"

   Identifier     "Monitor0"
   VendorName     "Unknown"
   ModelName      "Unknown"
   HorizSync       30.0 - 110.0
   VertRefresh     50.0 - 150.0
   Option         "DPMS"

EndSection

Section "Device"

   Identifier     "Device0"
   Driver         "nvidia"
   VendorName     "NVIDIA Corporation"

EndSection

Section "Screen"

   Identifier     "Screen0"
   Device         "Device0"
   Monitor        "Monitor0"
   DefaultDepth    24
   SubSection     "Display"
       Depth       24
   EndSubSection

EndSection

Household

Hello there, a user has queried your edit contribution [1] in this Household article. Would you be so kind, if you happen to have a moment, to consider the discussion, discuss and perhaps edit and/or reference? Many thanks and kind regards SeventhHell (talk) 06:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pareto set

The article Pareto set has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real content. Everything is contained in Pareto_efficiency#Pareto_frontier.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fly by Night (talk) 21:54, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Merge discussion for Discount window

An article that you have been involved in editing, Discount window, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Guidance

Hello. I'm new to the wiki community and would like to start working on editing the Property Insurance page with the help and collaboration of more experienced contributors from Project Finance Participants. There is a recommendation that the Chartis article be merged with AIG's page. I think the Property Insurance page could be strengthened with parts of AIG's page since it shows how current events and emerging trends effect it's regulation by the government. Hurricane Sandy and updated payouts of the WTC are not on the Property Insurance page either - which to me seem to be relevant. Do you think adding more information would be beneficial to the Property Insurance page? If so would you be interested in collaborating what facts should be included? Any response would be kindly appreciated. Thank you.Lgkkitkat (talk) 03:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basic financial concepts

Category:Basic financial concepts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 05:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basic financial concepts has been nominated for discussion

Category:Basic financial concepts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Corporate finance has been nominated for discussion

Category:Corporate finance, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Intrinsic value (numismatics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intrinsic value (numismatics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intrinsic value (numismatics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NotReallySoroka (talk) 07:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Long run" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Long run has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 25 § Long run until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kjell Jerselius

The article Kjell Jerselius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Marked for notability since March 2019, doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO. Google search returns no secondary significant coverage for either the person or the movie he directed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlexandraAVX (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]