Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese translation note

From Cleanup: Japanese translation note trans. should be standard, possible vfd? -- PlatinumX

It's already been here from that cleanup listing. You added it to cleanup on 16 March at 03:26 [1] and RickK listed it here at 04:46 [2]. That time, ending 22 March, there were three votes to keep (Taku, Texture, Jamesday), two votes to delete (Jiang, Exploding boy), one person who listed with a question and no delete reason and didn't vote either way (RickK) and one person who possibly suggested a move to the Wikipedia namespace(+sj+)[3]. Looks as though RickK forgot to remove it from Cleanup after putting it here. Jamesday 18:54, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Ask Taku why he made it. I think it could be incorporated into something else, but it is fine as it is now. BTW, this has been on VfD before and no one agreed to delete it... -- EmperorBMA / ブリイアン 22:08, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
plenty of people voted to delete. please ask the admin who unlisted it to archive the deletion debate on the article's talk page in the future. i again support deletion. tips on reading wikipedia do not belong in the main namespace. --Jiang 07:42, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- As many or more voted to keep. And that's how it's going this time as well - we've now accumulated one more different keep vote and one more different delete vote. Jamesday
Delete -- Cyrius | Talk 02:18, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Notes about how terms are translated are appropriate in the main article space because readers need to see them and confirm the term in the original language. Jamesday 18:54, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep - Shouldn't there be a minimum time between nominations for VfD? - Tεx τ urε 15:51, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep but only if there is some work on bringing some order and relevance to the list Chrissmith 10:50, Apr 14, 2004 (UTC)