Wikipedia talk:Historical archive/Policy/What's in, what's out
Please see previous discussion at the /Archive 1.
Status
[edit]The commentary currently on the page is becoming less and less useful as more notability guidelines are developed. Some sections should probably just be replaced with links. Ardric47 23:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
For historical reasons, though, perhaps the entire page could be archived as it is now? Ardric47 23:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Why not just make it not policy? I have been bold and done so; feel free to revert and explain why you disagree. --unforgettableid | talk to me 01:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Shall we revive Wikipedia:What's in, what's out? It will never become policy, but it is a useful reference as to whether certain things, like, say, most radio stations should normally be AfDed or not. Cheers, --unforgettableid | talk to me 19:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- "It will never become policy" = "{{historical}}" --Francis Schonken 07:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
WIWO is back!
[edit]It's offical! WIWO is back! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.66.35.10 (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. This is not how we elevate things to policy, and as it seems clear that you are aware of this I have simply rolled back your changes. Hans Adler 20:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]Can we please reach a consensus because I don't understand why it's kept for historical purposes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Typo385.5 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)