Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee for a Unified Labor Tendency

Committee for a Unified Labor Tendency

No such tendency exists --Sesel 20:46, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• it certainly fails the google test, and with a "best showing ever in an American presidential election in 2004, winning a total of twelve votes among the three states" it doesn't seem notable that way (unless no other party got fewer votes?). I'm assuming therefore that its either advertising or vanity, but the author has gone to a lot more effort than I'm used to seeing for either of these. They would probably be best pointed in the direction of some cheap/free webhosting. Maybe that way they'll get more than 12 votes in 2008? weak delete Thryduulf 01:04, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, fails Google Test. Megan1967 04:07, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity political ad. More people prolly voted for Mickey Mouse. Wyss 04:47, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- AllyUnion (talk) 06:44, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. I think it is supposed to be a joke (acronym is C.U.L.T.) --Sesel 20:00, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. Pretty funny, at least to those of us involved in left politics. -- Jmabel | Talk 18:49, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)