Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maude Senger
Maude Senger was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete
- My dumbass friend wrote this. I'm voting to delete it, for it is inane. 23:51, 10 Dec 2004
- Delete . This nonsensical fantasizing sillyness is surely not Wikipedia material. rturus 22:47, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Maybe not in this reality.
- Delete. Because it is nonsense, it is in fact entirely in keeping with the principles of Discordianism. But, y'know, I don't hold Sunday Mass in Maude Senger's living room; her demonstration of Discordian principles should not go in an encyclopedia. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:45, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Possibly even speedy for patent nonsense.--Lucky13pjn 01:04, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: We have an article on Discordianism. That's more than we need. We need more accordians than discordians. (And concertinas, too.) Geogre 01:37, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- An obvious pile of bovine excrement, but not patent nonsense.
Delete. [[User:Livajo|力伟|☺]] 03:33, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete without reservation. EventHorizon 04:17, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I made this. I'm voting to delete it.
- Speedy Delete. utcursch 12:55, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Coolgamer 17:10, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
- speedy delete and I added the speedy delete tag to the article. Nonsense. Tempshill 00:21, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Speedy deleted as nonsense. Thue | talk 15:59, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.