Talk:Cheongdo County

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheongdo County. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040122085417/http://eng.cheongdo.go.kr:80/ to http://eng.cheongdo.go.kr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review: Nice expansion of this article. I think some more pictures would be a nice addition if the commons has any available. How about some information about the geography or climate of the area? Zsj.engl300 (talk) 23:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ thanks! I tried to add pictures but couldn't figure it out :( And that's a good suggestion about the geography and climate! I will look into it, thank you Steeniejung (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Great additions to the article Steeniejung! My one recommendation would be to also talk about winter and other seasons in the climate and weather section. -Hulu92 (talk) 04:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]