User talk:Krischik

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 15:42, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

wikiversity vote

I see, I'll correct that (I accidently had my sig pointing my en page.... I was 99% sure it pointed to meta... anyway thanks for pointing that out!) Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 07:55, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity

I've removed the strikethrough. If you were talking about a link to my Wikipedia user page on Meta, it's done. If you were talking about having a registered account on Meta, I do- I just had my signature link to my Wikipedia user page, rather than to Meta. That's fixed as well. Ral 315 W_S 13:21, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

who is double-checking the validity of votes, and proper voter registration?

Thanks. If I get some time, I'll do some too. - RealGrouchy 16:00, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect vs. Delete

Thanks for the info :) --Prod-You 16:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vim

Fine. But I think you misunderstand the list if you think "best light" is appropriate. Morwen - Talk 08:13, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calling programmers

We need coders for the WikiProject Disambigation fixer. We need to make a program to make faster and easier the fixing of links. We will be happy if you could check the project. You can Help! --Neo139 09:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GPS disambiguation

Thanks for pointing out that Global Positioning System didn't have a link to GPS (disambiguation). If you encounter that again, it's really easy to fix: just add, e.g., {{redirect|GPS}} to the top of the page that the abbreviation redirect is to (in this case, you would want to add it to Global Positioning System). inkling 11:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evolving Virtual Enterprise

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Evolving Virtual Enterprise, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Davidprior 22:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not Microsoft C not Visual C++

I don't know how why you contacted me as I have never made any edits to neither "Microsoft C" nor "Visual C++" articles. Dyl (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now I remember. I created the redirection as part of the Hotlist missing articles project. At the time the Visual C++ was the only Microsoft C compiler article. Feel free to change it if there's a more appropriate article. Dyl (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calculator input methods

Hello Krischik. I disagree with the material you have added about entry formats.

The casio 7000G has exactly the same input method as the the casio 9850 series.

The 9860 has two modes: the first is the same as the previous casio models, the second is a more like the way equations are written on paper.

The phrase Direct Algebraic Logic is a trademark of Sharp. It is not a general term in use. Casio tends to use the phrase V.P.A.M Wikicgc (talk) 13:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keystroke programmable

A tag has been placed on Keystroke programmable requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pyho ^T / _C 03:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for assessment

I've left a few comments there. I've assessed the article (programmable calculator) as start class. Regards, Airplaneman ^talk 05:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AdaCore

The article AdaCore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability as established by significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Psychonaut (talk) 09:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MGTOW

Hello and thank you for your interest in creating the article MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way). Please if you would, do take note of the recent activity at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mgtow&curid=20736615&action=history .

Happy Editing! Chrisrus (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Casio FA-2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casio FA-2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio FA-2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 00:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Casio FA-1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casio FA-1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio FA-1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 00:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Casio FA-6 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casio FA-6 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio FA-6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 00:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Casio FP-10 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casio FP-10 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio FP-10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 00:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Krischik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Utz (file format)

The article Utz (file format) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ISO/IEC 14750

The article ISO/IEC 14750 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PolyORB

The article PolyORB has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability found for this software

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 20:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GNAT Programming Studio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GNAT Programming Studio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNAT Programming Studio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a reason I don't contribute to (the english) Wikipedia any more. Delete, delete and more delete. Enjoy your success while your delete (the english) Wikipedia into obscurity. Krischik ^T 06:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]