User talk:Wilfredo Martinez

Welcome!

Hello, Wilfredo Martinez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Lst 27 20:00, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thank you. Sorry I hadn't updated this page until now. Please put any comments regarding my work at Wikipedia here. Wilfredo Martinez 15:12, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight

As a member of WikiProject Comics, I thought you might be interested in the Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight we have set up. Please feel free to vote on the articles listed, although bear in mind that a vote for a particular article means you are pledging to help improve the article. The goal of the collaboration is to improve articles to Featured Article status, as we feel Comics is under-represented in that area. Thanks for your help. Steve block talk 16:03, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Marvel Universe

Please see the Timeline's talk page.--StAkAr Karnak 12:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

answer to your Kid Radd question

Answer to your question is at Talk:List of concluded webcomics#Kid_Radd. --EarthFurst 19:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The good news is there is a wiki article about Kid Radd at Comixpedia. --EarthFurst 02:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good edits!

Nice surgical edits and improvements at Speed Demon (Marvel Comics). It reads better. My compliments! --Tenebrae 16:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, that was a fast reaction! :p Nice to see such small contributions noticed, thanks. :) -Wilfredo Martinez 16:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleted images

I have proceeded to delete messages on my talk page regarding image deletions. Please note I am not opposed to this act because I understand that Wikipedia must protect itself from copyright violations; also, I'm not an expert on copyright laws so I cannot discuss this topic properly. However I feel that the posts themselves (with their showy warning signs) are annoying, especially the ones made by Bots and not people. Therefore I'm removing them for easy of reading of the page. I include this explanation here to note I'm not doing it out of spite. Anyone who wants to read those messages can do so by checking the page's history. Also, please refrain in the future from giving me any more warnings regarding image deletions. Just go ahead and remove them if you feel they are improper. (Bot messages will also be removed immediately.) Thank you. -Wilfredo Martinez 15:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Millennium -5.jpg

Dealt with, warning deleted (see above.) -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Set.jpg

The Set image is indeed inappropriate as it is from a Marvel Universe Handbook. Plus the article already features cover images. So go ahead an remove it. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 12:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sonofvulcan cover.jpg

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 13:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Starshine I.gif

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 13:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Starshine II.gif

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 13:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dc Presents - 28.jpg

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 00:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dial H for Hero 1.2.jpg

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 00:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dial H for Hero 2.jpg

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 00:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, help me out here.

‎Some IP guy is going around removing any instance in the Wild Arms articles that implies that they don't take place on the same world. He's pushed me past the point of caring, so I was wondering if you could go tell him that they don't take place on the same planet since that's what you asserted in an edit to Wild Arms 5 a while ago. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this is real mature. Why can't you talk things out like an adult? No matter how many people you rally that won't change anything. I've told you, if you can provide proof to what you claim, then that's fine, but you have yet to do so. Also, even the creators of the series have said that there is no definate answer, so it's all just a theory until one of the games proves otherwise.24.3.180.166 (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why are you stalking me through my contributions? Go away. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 04:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not stalking you.>_> I'm insulted that you would stoop this low instead of acting like an adult.24.3.180.166 (talk) 04:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware this was an issue. As someone who has played ALL the Wild Arms games (that have come out in America anyway) I can tell you that no, IT'S NOT THE SAME WORLD. The World Maps don't match and neither do the histories within the games; in particular, the cameo characters in Wild Arms 5 are NOT the same as the original ones, there are too many differences in their backstories. If anything, we'd need evidence that they *are* the same Filgaia, not the other way around. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 05:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is your theory and nothing more. I have also played all the games. I own every single artbook and guidebook, as well as all the complete and master guides, and even the novels for 5. Land masses and history and not definate and prove nothing. Even our continents were once just one big land mass. And there are many things in history even we do not know about. Above and beyond all else, the makers themselves have said there is no answer yet, so everything is nothing but theory. I'm not inserting that they do take place in the same world, and you should not insert that they don't, until there is solid proof. I can provide plenty of evidence to support my own beliefs, but that's more of a talk for IM or something, since I'm not the one trying to insert my beliefs into multiple articles as fact. As for the cameos, given that some of the characters are essentially immortal, if they are set on the same world, it is quite possible.24.3.180.166 (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're wrong on several points- from assuming that Wikipedia cannot present obvious points (such as that a videogame series reinvents its setting from episode to episode) to defending a point *without* giving your "evidence." In any case, this is an argument for the Wild Arms discussion page, not here; if you feel that strongly about this point, present your evidence there. This is meant for personal commentary, and I stopped arguing with close-minded Wikieditors a long time ago. No further comments on this matter will be accepted here; they will edited out. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 11:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comics Articles for Deletion

One or more articles you’ve been involved in editing (Melter, Ringer (comics), Ego the Living Planet, or others) has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 15:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the Nature of Wikipedia

This is an argument that keeps coming up, and I don't feel like repeating myself all the time, so I decided it would be more practical if I just stated my opinions here and then referred anyone who asks about them here.

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia in a Wiki format. Its purpose is to provide information on any subjects to everybody. It's built on the premise that anyone might have something to contribute. However, an encyclopedia also has to meet certain standards. It must be clear, ease to use, be well-sourced, avoid copyright infringements, and (even on the internet) consider what to include due to its limited space. It is work that should be done by professionals. Yet, by allowing it to be constantly edited by anyone, including amateurs, none of those goals can be assured. Alternatives would be:

only allowing people who join the site to edit articles, and keep a close eye on their track record; and/or
creating a separate area for public contributions, from which permanent articles can then be elected.

Under the current format, there is little point in arguing over rules or formats, which is why I've decided not to bother doing so. While I try to make my contributions as encyclopedic as possible, I'm not going to lose any sleep if they aren't. After all, nobody gets paid for working on Wikipedia; in fact, it's our contributions that keep the site up. So we don't owe it anything. It's a fun hobby, but as long as it's a Wiki, the people decide for themselves how they are going to contribute. Even the rules themselves are subject to change here. (The only ones that have to be obeyed all the time are actual laws, such as the ones regarding copyrights.) Being obsessed with the rules can be as disruptive as ignoring them completely. For example, some people have been asking for articles to be deleted because they are lacking certain elements, instead of asking for those elements to be provided (or providing them by themselves.) That's not constructive, it's destructive. We need to go by common sense.

Fair use rationale for Image:Wf142.jpg

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 17:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wf142.gif

Corrected. -Wilfredo Martinez (talk) 05:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major events

The article's main flaw is that it's too subjective. Was 52 really an "event"? "Great Darkness Saga"? What does "event" mean? A better idea might be repurposing the article into something like "List of DC Comics crossovers", which it seems like the article is generally leaning towards. This would be far more useful, and would solve the redundancy and subjectivity problems. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And any attempt to focus on the fictional stories themselves is flawed since DC can, has, and will change aspects of its fictional history on a whim. Focus on the comics, not the stories. Do that, and you'll eliminate the original research and subjectivity factors. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Starshine I.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Starshine I.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Starshine II.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Starshine II.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Major events of the Marvel Universe

I have nominated Major events of the Marvel Universe, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major events of the Marvel Universe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cameron Scott (talk) 08:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Fictional history of the Marvel Universe

I have nominated Fictional history of the Marvel Universe, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of the Marvel Universe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cameron Scott (talk) 15:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Spaceknights1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Spaceknights1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Xman31.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Xman31.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wf142.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Wf142.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Features of the Marvel Universe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Features of the Marvel Universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Superpower (ability) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superpower (ability) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superpower (ability) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 20:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Principality (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Principality (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principality (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 20:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wild Arms 3 Fan Book.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wild Arms 3 Fan Book.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rom (comics)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rom (comics), Wilfredo Martinez!

Wikipedia editor DrStrauss just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi, I've marked the page you created as reviewed. It's a very well written article indeed! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment on DrStrauss's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DrStrauss talk 22:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wf142.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wf142.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Supreme Intelligence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supreme Intelligence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme Intelligence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elder Gods (Marvel Comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elder Gods (Marvel Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elder Gods (Marvel Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dc Presents - 28.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dc Presents - 28.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dire Wraith

The article Dire Wraith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional character passes NFICTION/GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC) {{safesubst:#if:|== Proposed deletion of Zn'rx ==| TTN (talk) 12:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dire Wraith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dire Wraith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dire Wraith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gaea (Marvel Comics)

The article Gaea (Marvel Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Father Set (Marvel Universe).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Father Set (Marvel Universe).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kymellian

The article Kymellian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gods (DC Comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gods (DC Comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gods (DC Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kymellian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kymellian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kymellian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Features of the Marvel Universe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Features of the Marvel Universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]