User talk:Catbar

Hello there, honored vistor. If you're so inclined, please leave a new message.

Hello Brian, welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for adding the note to your website about Egyptian Mau cat. I've removed the copyright violation notice now.

Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Angela . 03:28, 5 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Brian, I made some minor changes to your Woodward Tornado article. While the referenced Web page is similar in outline and some content, I don't believe that we are in danger of copyright violation. Lou I 17:37, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Re: George W Bush: I didn't read back as far as Hephaestos's edit, I was just reverting the comment that he was responsible for millions of deaths worldwide... Graham :) 00:54, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

If he wins the Nobel I'll volunteer to eat him... Graham :) 11:39, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Regarding rabies, it certainly sounds like a reasonable hypothesis, I just don't want to imply it's a verified one (unless it is), or the standard, accepted one (unless it is), since one can think of other reasonable hypotheses as well<G>. I always thought it was a difference in biological susceptibility, but that could just my own peculiar hypothesis. - Nunh-huh 03:23, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)

copied from my own talk page:

Aw, ya bagged Alexander Woollcott! He was on my 'get to him if nobody beats you to it' list. You beat me to it. Congratulations.

Somewhere, I've read a lot about him. I don't think I've read the Teichmann bio, but I have read a Dorothy Parker bio, and Harpo's autobiography. I think I've also got a book on the Algonquin Round Table - that might have been where I read a lot about him. A very interesting, mostly forgotten character. I'll root throught the stacks and see what I find.

Thanks!

Brian Rock 00:27, 2004 Mar 9 (UTC)

~~I didn't address his sexuality, though~~ I didn't mention his island in Vermont, though, or a buncha other things; there's plenty left to do, and I owe the library a small fortune in fines, so I can't to do it.

Besides, you got Black 47, and thank the Lord I didn't have to cover that. --Charles A. L. 02:25, Mar 9, 2004 (UTC)

Hey, Brian! With cases like ALFRED NOBEL, it's easier to just turn it into a redirect. We don't keep duplicate articles. You also might want to read up on speedy deletions. All the best, Woodrow 02:14, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Brian - I note you've called the ZMC-2 as "only metalclad blimp ever built". Does David Schwarz's and Carl Berg's Metallballon of 1897 belong to a different class of airship? Lighter-than-air's not my area... --Rlandmann 02:24, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)

hello, David Schwarz's Airship was a rigid. It has had a wooden frame inside. This ship was the first time aluminium was used in aviation ever.

greetings hadhuey from german wiki

Brian, Thanks for your vote on my admin nomination. I was surprised there was support as a result of the only feline edit I've done on WP!

I take it that you know, and like, Tonks? I would have included the oddest thing I know about them, but it might have been applicable only to the one I knew best. She loved green pea soup and didn't like milk. Go figure?!

Thanks again. ww 20:43, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Brian,

I'm glad you think it's been on the whole good work. I'm not sure I can be as sure, as the holes and patches mostly stand out. And thanks for figuring out how to vote. Always good to pick up new skills...

Anyway, Keuda??!! Thanks for pointing them out to me. I'll be on the lookout for one at the next show I go to.

If you're willing to dive into something, I could use some perspective and comment in the crypto corner, from a non specialist. The really technical articles (algorithm innards and such) are a lot easier to do than the more general overview articles, partly because it's hard for an author (and crypto person) to see the places that just won't make sense to a general reader. And of course there are the dumb typos too -- but those are easier to find. If you'd be willing to dip into some of the overview crypto articles and point out places that just don't make any sense, I'd be grateful. Of course, I'll be glad to return the favor for articles you'd like a newish eye on. Maybe together we can exterminate a few opacities.

ww 17:02, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Brian,

thanks for being wiliing to lend an eye. It's not my work that I was looking to overview (needy of such as it is, I'm sure), it's crypto generally. You might look into Topics in Cryptography for an annotated list of many (most?) articles in the corner and start there. You might consider secure channel or diplomatic bag or key or ... It's exactly your non specialist eye which I was hoping to snag as opacity/obscurity and such are hard to see when you're too close to something.

Of course, if you'd like to correct a typo here and there... As for the mathematics, it's a specialized corner, but you might enjoy some of it. General readers aren't so likely to tolerate that sort of article though, so it's not so much of a problem in re opacity.

Anyway, I'd love to hear your comments and reactions. They will give those of us in the crypto corner a fresh perspective and help clean up a technical (but of general interest -- eg trusted computing and Digital Rights management) subject area.

ww 15:23, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I nominated you for adminship. Good luck, and keep up the good work. Meelar 04:49, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)

= Dioxin

Hello Brian

I see that your illustration of the structure of 2,3,7,8 tetrachloro-dibenzo-para-dioxin is marked 2,4,7,8 and I don't know how to go about correcting it. Nothing I can do but let you know, I guess. UninvitedCompany

adminship

A consensus has been reached by your peers that you should be an admin. I have made it so. Please review Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list and keep up the great work. Sincerely, Kingturtle 06:57, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Brian! Cribcage 16:07, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Flint-Worcester Tornadoes

Dear Brian,

It is okay with me to redirect this article since it talks about two tornadoes anyway.

BigT27 08:00, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, "be bold". I'm still trying to decide if "tornado" ought to be capitalized in those or not. :) - Hephaestos|§ 00:54, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Dot Project

(*evil cackling laugh*) Y'know, sooner or later I ought to post more detailed instructions... Essentially, I just take the maps already generated for the county articles, edit them so there's no red, and then go town by town using Mapquest to plot the locations and paste the dot in the right location manually. The little red circle is five pixels in diameter.

As far as finding the cities, there are the articles like List of cities in Arizona that list all of the municipalities with articles (usually), but I find it most useful to go county by county -- the rambot county articles also contain listings of towns. That's pretty much it. Let me know what state(s) you decide to start with, and I'll make a note of it. -- Seth Ilys 01:33, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "fixing up" the county maps -- so far as I know, they already exist and have been inserted into the Rambot articles. Are the county maps inaccurate? -- Seth Ilys 01:50, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, never mind. I understand now. Yes, that would be very useful! -- Seth Ilys 01:50, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Groovy. I'll be sure to watch for them. You're always welcome to help with the Dot Project, too. :) -- Seth Ilys 02:03, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

From the WikiProject article:

"The U.S. county maps are generated from scanned public domain originals, which have then been modified by User:Wapcaplet and User:Jdforrester to indicate the counties and licensed under the GFDL."

You might want to ask them if they still have the originals. -- The Anome 08:53, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Gee willikers, do you plan to upload a map of that nature for every town in Missouri? --Smack 00:07, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding the existence of blank US state maps, I'm afraid the only surviving copies I had were backed up to a CD-R that has since ceased to be functional. A shame, since I had them all in a higher-resolution format that would have made better source material for your project; but it looks like you're on your own for creating blank ones from the ones that are already posted. You could probably just flood-fill the red regions with white (and maybe desaturate the image to get rid of any residual red tinges) to get pristine versions from them. If you do that, you may consider doing what I ought to have done the first time, and post the blank ones to the Wiki for the benefit of future editors. Good luck! -- Wapcaplet 21:37, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Where to put the blank maps: I've just created Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps/Source materials for the purpose of listing and linking such images. Might be helpful to list them there as well. -- Wapcaplet 20:01, 14 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

When I've been creating the blank county maps as templates for the city dot-maps, I usually just take two county maps from counties on opposite sides of the state, then cut and paste them together to create one entirely blank map. Maybe that will work for you... -- Seth Ilys 03:17, 15 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Re: possible copyright on the maps. The ones I downloaded can be found in this directory; they are all copyrighted "U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census." AFAIK, all Census Bureau publications are public-domain. I did lots of editing to remove various guidelines, county names, pieces of lint, etc. If you are doing this all over again, I would recommend using the current U.S. Census county maps, which are here, and are in general nicer-looking (though they may require just as much editing). They are probably more up-to-date, as well. Ideally, we should have some nice SVG maps to work from, so if you find public-domain SVG state maps, they'd probably make the best source material. -- Wapcaplet 22:22, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, nice work on the maps! I got to trying to think of a way to automate the producing the maps. I know here in canada there is a standard grid for topographic maps. Given certain lat/long positions, you can pull up the corresponding map at varying scales (though the map doesn't need to be topographical, it could be a line drawing as yours are). Also because of the projection of those maps, it is easy to determine where to place a mark given those lat/long positions. Somewhere out there has to be a list of towns with their corresponding gps/lat+long data which could be fed into a small program which would then load the appropriate map, place the dot, and output the file with the filename being the name of the town into some directory; you could then simply pick a map as you needed it. The hardest part would be in finding properly-calibrated public-domain maps that looked good. I'll look into it some more. --Vanchuck 07:31, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I'll be writing a bit more about this on my user page if you're interested. --Vanchuck 08:18, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Maps...

I noticed you've been busy making municipal maps... Well I have been too! I was wondering if there was any sort of coordinated project? --"DICK" CHENEY 01:00, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I'll be sure to save Kansas and Ohio for you (and mark it as such), if you'd want to claim them. Have you finished Missouri, or are you taking a break from that with Arizona? -- Seth Ilys 01:19, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Sounds fine to me; I just thought I'd ask, since you mentioned them on HCheney's user page. I really do appreciate other people working on the project; it gives me some confidence that I'm not crazy in attempting it. :) -- Seth Ilys 01:35, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Oh, and feel free to update the project section of my user page as appropriate. I don't mind at all. -- Seth Ilys 01:38, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

png maps

If you're going to be posting large numbers of pngs (those maps), could you recompress them first?

I found this app awhile back, been using it on my images and now on images on wikipedia. Called pngcrush, it cycles though every possible style of compression on the image through different filters and compression levels. I tested several of your maps and got 30% reductions in filesize. Here's a link to the project with pngcrush: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pmt/

Best way to use it is 'pngcrush -brute infile.png outfile.png' If its a large file and you've got a slow computer, expect to be waiting awhile since it will go through around 110 compression styles. It ends by saying the % change in file size. You can mess with some other options too.

Hope you find that program helpful in making the wiki more image efficent.

name that butte (redux)

Thanks for your help with identifying Monument Valley. I'm going to upload an annotated version, the work-in-progress version of which is at [1]. Before I update it proper, I'd appreciate your comments. Thanks. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 19:58, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Colors of Stub links

Brian,

I saw your post on Meta:Help talk:Preferences about how to change stub colorings. I don't know any way to do this currently, but it sounds like a very reasonable request. In the last few weeks, Wikimedia started up a Wikimedia Bugzilla; if you're not familiar with it, Bugzilla is a tool used to track bug reports and feature requests in software. I think you should add a request for this feature to the Bugzilla. If you haven't used Bugzilla before, I'd be happy to help you file a request.

Have fun,

Creidieki 17:07, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

msg: no longer needed

I see that you've spent some time uploading maps showing the location of US towns, which is great. What I noticed from you uploads streaming past in the RecentChanges is that the summary includes {{msg:GFDL}}, and it is good to properly tag images; however you might be interested to know that since the upgrade of the wiki software a few months ago, one only needs to type {{GFDL}}. The msg: part is no longer mandatory. You don't have to use the new syntax, although on the plus side it will save a few keystroken.

Oak Hill

Nope, I live in Florida. I've never even been to Kansas. :) [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 00:43, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

I was looking at the U.S. city/state articles and noticed that you've made a number of bot changes specifically regarding the amazing dot project. I've chosen to multi-license all of the rambot contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike Licence. I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all your contributions (or at minimum those on the geographic articles) so that we can keep most of the articles available under the multi-license. Many users use the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template on their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I understand, but I thought I'd at least ask, just in case. -- Ram-Man 18:31, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

I'm fuzzy, too. The way I understand your note on my page, if I put the dual license template {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} on my User Page, I'll grant the CreativeCommons license to all my work on Wikipedia. I have no problem with that. Should I do something to current (and future) maps? By the way, I'm not using a bot; it's manual. Thanks. Catbar (Brian Rock) 00:50, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

To answer your questions: Yes, put that template on your user page and you will grant the usage of the license for all your work on Wikipedia (unless you specifically state any exclusions). Of course that is limited to only those changes which you are legally allowed to dual-license. If you copied text from one Wikipedia page to another, that would be only under the GFDL as you were not the author, but any eligible changes would be dual-licensed. As for the maps, they originally came from the public domain, however they were release exclusively into the GFDL by User:Wapcaplet and User:Jdforrester. Since the dot project has used their images, as a derivative work they must also be licensed under the GFDL. For the images to be dual-licensed, I must first get them to dual-license the original pictures. Then if that is successful, I can ask all the dot-project people to dual-license their pictures. But for now, you can't dual-license the pictures. -- Ram-Man 00:56, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)

Update: The source county images for the dot-project have all been multi-licensed by James F. and Wapcaplet into the CC-by, which is apparently one-way compatible with the CC-by-sa. I've am asking all of the dot-project contributors to multi-license their dot-project images under this license as well. Would you be agreeable to doing this as well? I know you already multi-license your contributions. I will use the rambot to update the copyright tags in the same way that it updated the tags in the source county images. Thanks! – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 21:29, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)

RFC pages on VfD

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:26, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Image recreation requests

Greetings. I just started the Wikipedia:Image recreation requests project, and I thought you might be interested. Your help would be greatly appreciated. (I got your name from the list at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Cartographers.) Best regards, – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 03:20, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Your LA images

I've taken the liberty of copyright-tagging your Louisiana "doton" images with GFDL tags, like the rest of them. If this is incorrect, let me know and I'll fix them. grendel|khan 05:27, 2005 Feb 27 (UTC)

Egyptain Mau

Hi Brian,

I saw your Maus, I'm a proud owner of an Emau Egyptian Mau wondering if our paths have crossed and need your help. I was hoping to speak with you privately, I tried to email you via your website but the email was returned. How might I email you?

DystopianAngel 18:56, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Show cat and genetic helth problems

I noticed that you have edited a section of the article show cat regarding the frequency of serious health problems in purebred cats. There is currently a discussion on the talk page about this section as to weather the article should state that this is a problem (the position I have taken) or weather the article should state that this is a misconception which is not true. Your input would we appreciated. Dalf | Talk 23:29, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for weighing in. Dalf | Talk 02:00, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we managed a compromised version of the paragraph. Go have a look. :) Dalf | Talk 06:19, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Map?

Hello,

I was wondering if you could tell me how one creates a city map with the red dot on the site of the U.S. state. I see you've made one for Odessa, Missouri. Thanks! Badagnani 08:42, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's complicated! I thought it was an automatic thing where you input the coordinates and out it comes. That shouldn't be too difficult but I guess for now it must be done by hand. Thanks for taking the time to explain the process. I was working on a new article on the small town of Eulonia, Georgia but couldn't get a map to come out, and now I know why. By the way, it looks like you're only a few minutes west of me; I'm finishing a music degree at Kent State. Best, Badagnani 21:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion page of Cabot, Arkansas

Thank you for your defense of Wikipedia on the discussion page of Cabot, Arkansas. I've corrected the false inputs, only a few months after they were made! InvictaHOG 19:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No relationship to Goodyear other than using the tires. InvictaHOG seems to be a motorcycle club in England, too. No relationship to that, either. Just my backpack and alma mater...InvictaHOG 03:22, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stink.inc

Hi, just a reminder that when you speedy something that has already gone to afd, you still need to close out the afd. I've done this one.
brenneman ^(t)^(c) 00:55, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NFPA triangles

Thanks for correcting the NFPA triangles on acetone, acetaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide: I don't know why I missed these errors in such high-profile articles! For reference, WP:Chem tends to use the NFPA values given on the International Chemical Safety Card (where these are available) rather than values provided by manufacturers: there is no problem for the changes you have made, as the ICSC values are identical to the ones you put in the tables. Physchim62 (talk) 12:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

I know that you don't know me, but I just want to wish you a Happy Birthday! JaredW 12:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dots on Maps

What's the easiest way to do the dots on the maps for the cities, towns, and villages? I see that you've done quite a few. I'm interested in filling out the ones you missed in southern Louisiana. Any help is appreciated.

Ja Braud

Nova Episode List

Thanks for helping out. I've been very busy and unable to give the page the attention I initially intended. pattersonc 05:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Catbar! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um... 'scuse me?

Hope I didn't do anything too bad :\ _-M ^o P-_ 22:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! :) That's ok, I was just a bit taken off guard. And don't worry yourself, we all make mistakes. :) Take care, _-M ^o P-_ 22:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Hi there - I have a small query - Is it ok to archive discussion pages on articles with a lot of discussion, or is archiving only allowed on userpage talk pages? Benjaminstewart05 12:43, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available

After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

You're completely wrong - there's nothing wrong with linking to a redirect. Please show me the "standard Wikipedia conventions" that you are applying. --SPUI (T - C) 18:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rolla Buddy

Hey there Catbar. My father's name is indeed David.

I'll ask him about you the next time I get the chance. The internet makes it a small, small world. Have a great day! Benzene 09:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Hallo Catbar;
would you consider to upload your maps into commons for further use in other languages ?--84.142.53.113 18:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Baseline Killer, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Vandal editing after blocks

I was going through Recent changes and was ran into an editor who according to thier page is blocked user IP 72.135.196.106 they were blocked and even appealed and denined appeal on the 18th yet posted a bunch more vandalism on the 19th? How can they do that if the IP is blocked? The reason I ask you is you were the one who rightly blocked the vandal to begin with. Thanks for listening.--Xiahou 04:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OHMap-doton-Ada.png

I copied this file on commons. Do you can delete this file on en-wiki? Mario58 21:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Blatant Vandalism

Hi. I read your message about blatant vandalism on Xiahou's talk page. Since you are an administrator, I can trust you to know about Wikipedia's polices, make a judgement, and act as an arbitrator on this situation. I was unsure becasue I have recently made the mistake by assuming no good-faith and biting the newbies, but now I know in the case of this IP, there is no good faith to assume. If there's anything else I should know regarding this, could you please let me know. Thanks.--Wikipedier (talk • contribs) 00:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sure he puts it on your page and not mine! just kidding. Thanks for the input. I see by your picture you are a gentleman of 'age' aka not a kid. I to am past 30. So I guess maybe seeing 'kids' go nuts and putting blatant vandalism everywhere just irks me so much. Which is honestly why I enjoy cleaning it up for those who want to use wiki for one of its major purposes - to read and learn. Its how I came here. I've been reading wiki since its early days. Didn't at first understand I could edit then later, didn't feel I should but after seeing enough vandalism I thought I could help 'stem the tide' somewhat. To make a long post short I agree when you see obscene word after obscene word, hate comments and the like you don't need to assume anything but pure vandalism. Call em as I see em. Common sense with age I guess. See you around --Xiahou 01:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely accept, but I didn't think there was anything to apologize about. I'm the one who needs to work on not biting the newbies, and I wanted to just be able to accomplish that and approprietely warn users about vandalism and blatant vandalism at the same time.--Wikipedier (talk • contribs) 20:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ARMap-doton-Little_Rock.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ARMap-doton-Little_Rock.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT (416) 00:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BritishAntiLewisite.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BritishAntiLewisite.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 04:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WhatDoYouWantFromLive.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WhatDoYouWantFromLive.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Just wanted to know how to change a picture in the Article about the cat breed "Norwegian Forest Cat" (not the English version but the article in Norwegian) since the image there aren't a "good" example of the breed Norwegian Forest Car. This is a scanned image of a poster of a lot of car breeds, so here you can really see a good example of the breed: http://two.xthost.info/Default/Norwegian_Forest_Car.png Thats not the image I want to upload since I don't have the right to use it. I myself "own" a cat which is a Norwegian Forest Cat, and it's so much alike the picture above it's scary. Therefor I have a lot of pictures and wish to upload one and replace the example in this article: http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norsk_skogkatt (The picture there might be a cat of the breed Norwegian Forest Cat, but not a good example. Believe me, in Norway no-one believes that to be a Norwegian Forest Cat)

Could you tell me how or maybe do it for me? :-)Teh.yellow.duck 14:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More help needed

Thanks, but the thing I need help to is the part where I change the picture thats all ready there. The article is "Semi-Protected" and even if if wasn't I don't think there would be an "edit image" on the Image, even though it is on each of the other sections of the article. The upload thing I can do. If you see on the English version of the article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Forest_Cat) I've actually uploaded the last image in the section that has a lot of examples of the breed. How to take a picture and make it the main picture in an article is therefore what I need to know.Teh.yellow.duck 13:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New photo

I was always going to use a new photograph in the article, and today I took a lot of new photos of my cat, and here's the best I managed to take of my active cat: http://i19.tinypic.com/4plvv9i.png And as you can see, it's almost identical to the poster i bought as a child: http://i12.tinypic.com/54jtxkk.png

Should I continue uploading the original (http://i19.tinypic.com/4plvv9i.png is a resized version for uploading purposes)Teh.yellow.duck 22:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheTubesAlbum.png

Thanks for uploading Image:TheTubesAlbum.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RemoteControlAlbum.png

Thanks for uploading Image:RemoteControlAlbum.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you Please help ?

Hello, 
I know Iam new to wikipedi but Im am five seconds away from crying since I posted what i considered a useful pice of information to an article I have been ganged up on had My user page deleted! I have been Block for no reason! I have been restored only to recive abuse from the same people I was keeping a record of all there actions till i could find someone to help me ! Its been deleted. Can you help what should i do :( thanks kate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 100%freehuman (talk • contribs) 11:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TillWeHaveFaces.png

Thanks for uploading Image:TillWeHaveFaces.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

American Keuda

Just thought I'd tip you - due to lack of sources, someone tagged the American Keuda page you made a while back as a possible hoax. It's fairly clear to me that the Keuda exists, but I can't find that much more about it; you might want to drop by and put a word in. Coanda-1910 (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beer category decision

A discussion has been opened on changes that have been made to the existing Beer category system. The changes reverse the decision made by the Project in April 2006. The changes were based on agreement by only two people, and by a discussion that took place outside the Beer Project. There may be some merit in the changes, and to prevent future conflict it is important that there is some discussion of the matter. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beer#Brewery_cats. SilkTork *^YES! 14:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of American Keuda

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article American Keuda, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 21:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High Weirdness By Mail

Hi Brian. Saw you added a link to the article - I'm thinking about trying to expand it. Trouble is, I've been and gone and lost my copy (actually I rather think some tosspot nicked it because I'd NEVER have got rid of such a precious volume knowingly). What I was hoping for are more links - Sub Genius page is good on the contents but I'd like to see if I could find some sources which reviewed it or mentioned it or any cultural references, you know the things. Any clues or hints as to where to start would be most welcome, if you have any...also, must say big up on doing pages on Must (someone's given me a bottle of grappa...), Phossy Jaw and the Klaus Nomi stuff - coincidentally, all of which I visited just today (Louis Slotin was last week, though). Ta. All the Best, Plutonium27 (talk) 07:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio

Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot (Disable) 03:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio

Are you from the Ohio area? A Wikipedian meetup is taking place on July 18, 2009 in Columbus. If you are interested in coming or would like more information, see the first Ohio meetup page.

Thanks! --Rkitko ^(talk) 19:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of American Keuda

An article that you have been involved in editing, American Keuda, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Keuda. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 16:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beta-thujone.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beta-thujone.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

File:Thalidomide structure.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thalidomide structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio Map

Hello Catbar - I modified a file you created for Fostoria, Ohio, naming the modified version "Ohio Glass Making Centers 1888.jpg". It was essentially taking your map, and adding two circles. For some reason the map was deleted without any notification. I suspect my attribution was not done properly. The map was used by Novelty Glass Company Wikipedia page. Any suggestions, thoughts or problems? I thought the map was useful. TwoScars (talk) 21:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016

Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

File:Blank county map of Arizona.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blank county map of Arizona.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GXXF T • C 19:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add an author

File:Blank county map of Missouri.png needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Blank county map of Missouri.png appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
Where and how this particular version was obtained.
When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Catbar}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Nokib ^Poke 08:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Blank county map of Missouri.png

The file File:Blank county map of Missouri.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:11, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Blank county map of Arkansas.png

The file File:Blank county map of Arkansas.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:11, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Map of Missouri highlighting Saint Francois County.png

The file File:Map of Missouri highlighting Saint Francois County.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Missouri DotProject status small.png

The file File:Missouri DotProject status small.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Missouri DotProject status small.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Missouri DotProject status small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KlausNomiAlbum.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KlausNomiAlbum.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]