Talk:1997 Canadian federal election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Governments Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Untitled

We now have consistent colour-coding of the Conservative Party (historical) and the Progressive Conservative Party from 1867-2000. The "powderblue" should make the data legible on most if not all monitors, unlike the previous colour, which was almost the same colour as the text on both monitors that I use. I really hope that we won't have someone go in and randomly change a few years' elections to different colours and mess up this consistency. After 2000, there is no need to adjust colours, I think, since the new Conservative Party is the result of a merger, and therefore warrants a new colour. Kevintoronto 22:37, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Data errors

In the "results by province" table, Ontario is shown with 101 + 1 + 1 = 101 seats. That doesn't add up. I haven't checked other sources to see where the error might be.

(01:15 UTC, December 20, 2005)

File:PrestonManning.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:PrestonManning.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canadian federal election, 1997. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060314142238/http://www.egwald.com/statistics/canadianelections.php3 to http://www.egwald.com/statistics/canadianelections.php3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Preston Manning 90s.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Error on Riding Map

In Newfoundland the PCs are shown with 6 ridings to the Liberals' 1 on the riding map, while the provincial map lists them as having 4 ridings to the Liberals' 3. The latter aligns with official results from Elections Canada. I believe that specifically Bonavista--Trinity--Conception and Humber--St. Barbe--Baie Verte (all along the northern border) should be the palest shade of red rather than blue. Additionally, the seat totals listed in the top-right corner don't seem to align with the other numbers within the infobox. Jujubeecat (talk) 04:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you're correct. Going to ping the mapmaker @BJenkins42:, though they haven't been active since creating the map.-- Earl Andrew - talk 04:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed both issues I think. Kavigupta (talk) 21:46, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 137.28.231.243 (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crap, didn't realize I wasn't logged in lmao BJenkins42 (talk) 18:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]