User talk:SamB

Welcome!

Hello, SamB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 14:34, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)

Hey! I appreciate your notice of my partial conversion of {{USRD}} to {{WPBannerMeta}}, but please don't get ahead of yourself. I don't have any plans to further develop this port until the Lua version of WPBannerMeta is complete. It was more of a simple proof-of-concept test. Thanks anyway. -happy 5214 17:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lemma error

You have just moved The New Testament in the Original Greek to Wescott-Hort. But unfortunately this is not right. This edition is named after Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort so Westcott-Hort would be the right lemma or else Westcott & Hort or Westcott and Hort. I dont know what you have done besides that, but it is not possible to move it to the right lemma because there exists a redirect. So please do whatever it takes to fix the problem.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 20:50, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced beerware

There is an official FSF list with GPL-compatible licenses, if you find beerware there, great, add a reference, add a GPL yes, and update Comparison of free and open-source software licenses, section #Approvals, row beerware. As long as there is a no what other projects say is irrelevant. Notably Debian is also listed as no, while you claim that they approved it as GPL-compatible, something they are not entitled to do, the FSF decides it. Bring references. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Be..anyone: The FSF's list can hardly be expected to be complete, and in fact the FSF is NOT authoritative with respect to GPL compatibility; the FSF's silence certainly doesn't override Fedora's determination that the license is GPL compatible. (The real authority on GPL compatibility is the courts.) For DFSG, ftp-master is authoritative, but I'm not sure how to cite their acceptance of a package. In both cases, a value of "No" is wrong here; if we can't do "Yes" we should just say "?" or something. —SamB (talk) 04:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm okay with ?, because the FSF has a really unclear "informative", which might cover beerware or not. But a decisive yes for Debian would be much better. But no ? on the comparison list, that's strict, yes means listed by name. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Device mapper category

Hello! I've removed Device mapper category from Device mapper, dm-cache and dm-crypt articles, as it pretty much just causes unnecessary fragmentation within the Linux kernel features category. Once we have more than three articles related to the device mapper, this new category is going to fit much better. Hope you agree. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 19:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dsimic: Well, working from https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Категория:Device_mapper, I already found Linux DM Multipath, and was just trying to decide whether LVM2 or mdadm belonged in the category despite being in userspace. (Turns out mdadm doesn't really touch the device mapper stuff anyway.) —SamB (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, there are already similar categories with only three articles (Linux kernel live patching category, for example), so I've reinstated Device mapper category within the three articles listed above. By the way, as you've noted above, device mapper and mdadm are completely unrelated. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 20:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia citation/link tools

Slash in the name of wiki pages generally means that what follows the slash is a subpage, so this naming is confusing. Why not use "and" instead of /. Also, "external" should be in the name of the category if it's supposed to be only for tools for external links. --V111P (talk) 07:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@V111P: Oh, oops, I didn't remember/realize that subpages were enabled in the category namespace. And I admit I wasn't thinking about external links when I came up with the name, though now I wonder if one of these ideas wouldn't be better:

Three or four categories: Category:Wikipedia citation tools, Category:Wikipedia internal link tools, Category:Wikipedia external link tools, and perhaps Category:Wikipedia link tools as an ancestor for the other two link tool categories.
Just throw it all in one category, Category:Wikipedia citation and link tools, which would be just like Category:Wikipedia citation/link tools except without the word "external".

Or if we wanted ridiculous nesting levels, we could add all five! —SamB (talk) 17:25, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying that subpages are enabled in the category namespace, I'm just saying that this naming might be a little confusing to people. As to the other question it comes down to what kinds of tools are available. Internal and external link tools are probably going to be very different, so there may not be a reason for having even a new common super category, while citations do contain external links, so the tools may overlap, so they may be either in one category, or two but linked in the description of each (e.g. "See also Category:Wikipedia external link tools"), but I'm not sure there are enough tools dealing just with external links and not citation to justify a category. The cat can just be called Citation tools and also include a few tools for external links which can also stay in the common cat Wiki tools. I hope this helps, but you decide. :) --V111P (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Life novels

If you are interested I think there are a couple more, one by Piers Anthony and one by Greg Bear. Would need a little research as I can't remember the titles (and, of course, might be wrong). All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Civil Rights Movement

I have placed a Template:Cn on the Civil Rights Movement (disambiguation) page. I could not find a scholarly source that states,

"Civil Rights Movement refers to a movement seeking to improve civil and political rights, in particular by (a) making it illegal to, and/or (b) making it legal not to, discriminate against a group of people on the basis of ethnicity, gender, or the like."

Please provide the scholarly source you used for that definition. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 05:42, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitchumch: I was just trying to summarize, but I guess you have a point that it ought to be sourced somewhere; the other facts on the page are supposed to be sourced in their corresponding articles, but clearly there isn't one for this definition. I think it would probably be okay to keep the part before the comma, though; it isn't exactly synthesis or OR to connect the term Civil Rights Movement with civil and political rights, is it? (Maybe we could paraphrase something from civil rights movements?)

Anyway, that page is obviously far from perfect; I just thought it would be a good idea to have a page with links to different [elements of] civil rights movements, with less prose to skim than civil rights movements. —SamB (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would probably be okay to keep the part before the comma, though;

The Civil Rights Movement term on wikipedia, from my experience, suffers from too many editors not consulting sources to define it. The Civil Rights Movement is not an obscure topic - there are literally thousands of books and articles written about it. Consequently, if you are unable to support any statement with a citation from a reliable secondary source, then it's not a good idea to write it.

it isn't exactly synthesis or OR to connect the term Civil Rights Movement with civil and political rights, is it?

Please refer to the scholarly sources to answer this question.

Maybe we could paraphrase something from civil rights movements?

I participated in a lengthy discussion about the title of the article Civil rights movements. I also placed a Template:Cn in the first sentence of the lead paragraph that defined the term. No citation was ever given. That article is potentially OR. See Remove Movements for civil rights for a separate discussion surrounding original research concerns. Consequently, I would refrain from using that article for guidance.

I am concerned that the tone of my remarks are questionable. So, please do not take offense to my remarks. I am very interested in improving the quality of articles about the Civil Rights Movement on wikipedia. However, I have constantly found myself trying to undo unsourced claims. I am hoping this disambiguation page does not become another source of unsourced claims. Thanks for responding to my concerns. Mitchumch (talk) 11:14, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notification

Since you reverted my redirection at PNGOUT, this is a courtesy message to alert you that I've nominated the page for deletion. The discussion is here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portable Network Graphics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDAT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:First post (internet meme) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:First post (internet meme), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:First post (internet meme)

Hello, SamB. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "First post".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SamB. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SamB. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SamB. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SamB. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Version Control by Example for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Version Control by Example, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Version Control by Example until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Version Control by Example cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Version Control by Example cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]