User talk:Paul Murray

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Paul Murray, welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for all your contributions. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

—Noldoaran (Talk) 05:48, Dec 14, 2003 (UTC)

Geometry of Complex Numbers

I am moving this to User:Pmurray_bigpond.com/Geometry of Complex Numbers while I am still investigating it.

If you are interested, ulimately I hope to build a java screen saver that does quasifuchan limit sets. (User:Pmurray bigpond.com forgot to sign)

Great you moved it. I might visit it from time to time.

About the java screen saver, I am not sure I understand what that has to do with Wikipedia. Enjoy! Oleg Alexandrov 05:09, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Well, the screensaver isn't strictly to do with wikipedia, but seeing as I am going to the trouble of getting on top of all this math, it seems a shame not to write it down somewhere. Most of the stuff in Mobius Transformation is mine.

I already have a couple of other screensavers. One is an implementation of "quasitiler" (for which I had to find out about zonotopes), and the other projects world costline data onto the screen using various map projections and rolls the globe around in arbitrary directions - the idewa being that it allows you to see how the various projections distort the map. (User:Pmurray bigpond.com forgot to sign)

Got it. Just one remark. It is good to sign your posts. That is accomplished by putting four tildas one after another — ~~~~, which Wikipedia will replace by your username and date, like this: Oleg Alexandrov 05:36, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Stereographic projection

Hello. Please note that Wikipedia conventions call for only sparing use of capitals in section headings, thus: Polar coordinates, not Polar Coordinates. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style. I fixed this in stereographic projection. Michael Hardy 21:34, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Mathematical methods

Hello. I am wondering what you are trying to do with Category:Mathematical methods. At the moment, it has Category:Algorithms as both a subcategory and a supercategory, which seems rather strange to me. Do you know why Category:Mathematical methods was created in the first place? I have no idea what articles this category is supposed to contain. -- Jitse Niesen 13:13, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I think I confused myself. In one sense, computing is a subset of mathematics, so any algorithm is nessesarily mathematical. But otoh: many algorithms to not involve things that we think of as mathematical - sorting and searching. There's considerable overlap in the respect that matematical methods are often implemented on computers.

Added to this is the point that Category: Mathematical Methods is pretty empty. It shouldn't be. Many math pages contain useful recipies for doing things, although ...

Hmm, ok. How about this:

by mathematical method, we mean "useful recipies for doing common tasks", usually involving performing a sequence of steps. This category groups together pages which not merely contain such recipies, but are specifically about them. Although mathematical methods are often computer implemented, they are not nessesarily so. Recipies relating primarily to computing (eg: searching and sorting) are in Category: Algorithms.

The relation between the two categories would be via link, rather than making one a subcategory of the other.

Pmurray bigpond.com 01:36, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I still don't see what you mean. The phrase "useful recipies for doing common tasks" seems to be a definition for an algorithm; for instance, algorithm states: "An algorithm [...] is a finite set of well-defined instructions for accomplishing some task." In particular, an algorithm does not need to be implemented on a computer.

I'm currently of the opinion that Category: Mathematical methods should be deleted. Can you think of any article that should be in Category: Mathematical methods and not in Category: Algorithms? -- Jitse Niesen 10:56, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mobius graphics

Hi, wanted to provide a big thank-you for adding the graphics to Mobius transformation. I'd read the term "loxodromic" I don't know how many times, and never had a clue that this is what it meant. So again, thanks!

Also, please continue work on the geometry of complex numbers. This promises to be interesting. Also, I don't know if you know this, but it might also be suitably distracting. Roger Penrose came up with something called twistors, which do to 4-dimensional space-time kind of what your geometry of complex numbers does to ordinary 2-D Euclidean space. Various famous formulas from math and physics, e.g. curvature, maxwell's equations, etc. take on a new weird and wonderful form when re-expressed as twistors. So please, keep at it. linas 13:02, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mobius graphics redux

Hi, The Mobius transform article also also defines the phrase "characteristic parallelogram". I was wondering if you could create one of your fantastic charts that has superimposed on it the characteristic parallelogram. I'm guessing what it will look like, but I want to know for sure. (I guess its rectangle for the elliptic xforms? and a parallelo only for the loxodroms; right????)!! Thanks, linas 21:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. BTW, It is no accident that the loxodromic curves resemble the curlies seen in the mandelbrot set blowups. The mandelbrot set has embedded in it a pile of modular group-like symmetries. The loxodromic spirals are just one more bit of evidence. linas 05:46, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pencils

BTW, I think one of the requested math articles out there is to cover "pencils", maybe Lefshetz pencils or something like that. I have no idea if your pencils are those pencils. Would you know? linas 13:10, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uluru photos

On Talk:Uluru#photos you asserted: Also that caption "climbers ignoring warning signs" is biased. For all we know, they read the sign thoroughly. ... Saaaay - those photographs look very much like two of the ones I took when I was there, which I posted on my website for a while. If so, they are not used with permission. Well, that's the world wide web for you. Pmurray bigpond.com 04:05, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On the assumption from the context of the assertion within the paragraph above you are referring to Image:Uluruwarning.jpg, I have notified user:LeeM who upoaded the image asserting s/he took it. It is a very serious assertion that someone has breached copyright and lied about it. Could you please clarify which photos you are referring to.--AYArktos 09:57, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apology added to uluru talk, AYArktos and LeeM notified. Pmurray bigpond.com 02:00, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PD-user image tag

In the future, when you want to release an image you created to the public domain(like Image:Mob3d-hyp-arb-480.png), the best way to do so is just to add the following to the image description page:

{{PD-user|Pmurray bigpond.com}}

That results in

This image has been (or is hereby) released into the public domain by its creator, Pmurray bigpond.com. This applies worldwide.

and puts it in the Category:User-created public domain images.

I've added the tag to the image mentioned above, but you might go through and add it to the other images you've uploaded(or just tell me to do it, and I'll do it and point to your comment as justification). Thanks for your work on the 'pedia! JesseW, the juggling janitor 08:12, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

You'd tagged the top and bottom rows, but not the middle row. I've tagged them, now. Thanks! JesseW, the juggling janitor 08:32, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Australian English

Hi PMurray. I reverted your edits to the above article because most of the content you added is covered in the article Australian words, clearly linked to the Australian English article. Cheers. Natgoo 00:40, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, most of the material was not encyclopedic in tone. It read more like a blog, or the discussions going on in the talk pages. Stick to facts, and write in a neutral tone. None of this "here in canberra..." business. Imroy 02:48, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Australian words

Oh great, you've done the same hatchet job to this article. For god's sake, read the article first before adding to it! You've added a number of entries to the general section that are already described in later sections. And once again, take care with what you write. Do not include a joke when it's not needed, or at least introduce it properly. Don't just put it in brackets with 'P.S...'. We're trying to write an encyclopedia here. Imroy 03:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mobius23622.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobius23622.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 01:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mobius Large Pos Elliptical.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobius Large Pos Elliptical.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 04:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mobius Small Neg Elliptical.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobius Small Neg Elliptical.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 04:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mobius Small Neg Hyperbolic.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobius Small Neg Hyperbolic.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 04:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Mobius23621.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobius23621.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Mobius23623.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobius23623.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:40, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Mobius23624.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobius23624.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NandFullAdder.png

What did you use to draw NandFullAdder.png?

I forget - might have been something on the mac. BTW: you need to add your name with four tildes if you want me to reply on your talk page.

Your username

The bigpond.com part of your username is not appropriate per Wikipedia:Username#Inappropriate usernames. You'll have to choose a new account name, and make a request at the Wikipedia:Changing username page. (You could also simply start a new account, but I suppose you want to keep your established edit history attributed to the new name. If you feel your username does not violate the rule we can request further comments at WP:RFC/NAME first.) In the meantime please avoid making edits from this account which are not related to the name change. Thank you. Femto 15:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the namechange failed because User:Paul.Murray is already occupied by a banned vandal with only one edit. User:Paul Murray is still free though (the similarity should be no problem in this case, asked at Wikipedia talk:Username#"Paul Murray" vs. "Paul.Murray" to make sure, I don't think anybody can reasonably object), just try again? Femto 16:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well? Femto 21:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: [1] You didn't catch the reply here Wikipedia talk:Changing username/Archive 2#names with spaces? Just needs another underscore. This should work: {{subst:Renameuser|Pmurray_bigpond.com|Paul_Murray|current name infriges policy}} -- ~~~~ Good luck! Femto 10:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you requested, your username has now been changed from Pmurray bigpond.com to Paul Murray. If you haven't done it already, please remember to move your user page and your talk page using the "move" tab on the upper right-hand side of your screen. Redux 13:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move is done

So there.

Glad that's over, huh? Merry (ex)christmas and happy editing! Femto 12:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mobius Transform

hi, Paul, i answered your mobius transform page on my talk page. Will look further if necessary. thanks. Xah Lee 06:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 04:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Men's rights

Because of the controversy surrounding this subject, and a recent call by an editor for others sympathetic to his viewpoint to register as editors on Wikipedia and help with editing, please do not add information to this article without also providing a source(s), in the article, supporting the information that you are adding. Thanks. -- John Broughton (☎☎) 15:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Font on my signature

Paul - I'm not sure if I understand your question. If you edit a page (like this one), you'll see the raw code (including the font) for my signature; that's why it reads as it does. If you're asking the more general question - how does any editor customize their signature, the answer is to use "my preferences" (on the top of any page, once logged in), and at the user profile tab, check "raw signature", then put whatever you want in the signature box.

You'll find that info and more at Wikipedia:Customisation#User name and signatures andWikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages (bad title for the page, since it also includes customization information). If you really want to customize your signature, take a look at User:Athaenara/Gallery, but be aware that there is movement afoot to sharply cut back on the maximum signature length (raw characters visible when in page edit mode), so many of the signatures may be unacceptable in the near future. -- John Broughton (☎☎) 00:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new article

A tag has been placed on Generalised circle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Xiahou 01:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Goat tongue

An article that you have been involved in editing, Goat tongue, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goat tongue. Thank you. Lurker (said · done) 13:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compatibilism and incompatibilism

I recently replied to your comment on talk:Compatibilism and incompatibilism. Take a look. Yaris678 (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mobius Identity.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mobius Identity.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 20:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mobius Large Pos Hyperbolic.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mobius Large Pos Hyperbolic.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 06:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the licensing tags! ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOR Full Adder?

Hi Paul,

I noticed you uploaded quite a nice looking Nand Full Adder, do you have a similar design using only Nor gates by any chance?

Thanks, ^{SteelersFanUK06} ReplyOnMine! 15:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emblem

Thanks for the interesting contribution to the discussion page for Emblem.

I have done a little work on the page, and wondered if you fancied popping over and checking the article's content, and maybe polishing it a bit. If not, don't worry.

Thanks, --James Chenery (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talking chickens @ smoothsort

I'm sorry; the 'talking chicken' was rather rude of me, and I don't really have any excuse for saying it. What I meant to communicate was that the article was way too high quality to meet the criteria for a stub. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 20:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:NorAdder.svg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:NorAdder.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 18:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant on the above drawing. Thank you for the message. --^{SteelersFanUK06} ReplyOnMine! 14:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English variant in Generalised circle

Hi, Paul!

You started the aforementioned article, and was its first main contributor. Thus, your choice of English variant should be the norm for the article. However, I'm not quite sure of which norm you wanted to follow; you wrote generalised but center. Is this combination common in Australian English; and is Australian English what you intended to write?

I'm asking, since I'd like to clean up the language appropriately.

By the way, another (uninlogged) user added the portmanteau word cline (not to confuse with the ordinary word cline) as a synonym for generalised circle. Is this a term you have seen? (Possibly, it was invented by the IP, in which case it ought to be removed.) JoergenB (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. However, I do not have access to the Macquarie Dictionary, I think. Our Wikipedia article implicitly claims that it only gives the spelling centre, and does not mention a split depending on the meaning of the word. The same goes for the quotation in WP:MOSS. However, the latter refers to the forth edition (2005), and there is a fifth edition around.

Do you have access to the latest paper edition, or to the on line edition, of Macquarie? If so, could you please check the item(s) center/centre? If both spellings are mentioned (with or without a distinction of meanings), our article Macquarie Dictionary ought to be updated! JoergenB (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ExponentialTree2.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ExponentialTree2.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Drunken Bakers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Odd couple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fredkin Full Adder.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fredkin Full Adder.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paul Murray. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paul Murray. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Paul Murray. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Paul Murray. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Toffoli Gate Adder.PNG

The file File:Toffoli Gate Adder.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]