This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Gangtok is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
"...the channels available throughout India are also available here." The "here" should be specified or this sentence should be removed, I think Isjee594 (talk) 15:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My recent edit to this page was reverted as it appeared to the editor to be WP:ADVOCACY of a particular point of view, specifically waste management in Indian cities or by Indian municipalities. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and see myself as a steward for water, sanitation and solid waste management related content on the site. These are the issues that I intend to write about in a neutral, balanced and informative manner. On reading my edits to the Gangtok page you will find that all of the content is verifiable i.e. it is sourced from reliable and published sources. My writing style, in my opinion, is (1) fact based, (2) neutral in tone without any puffery, contentious labels or unsupported attributions and (3) balanced i.e. holistic and not highlighting fringe views. I do not regard my edits as WP:ADVOCACY and would like to restore the content.
This article doesn't seem to be quite up to the current featured article criteria. The history section doesn't seem to be quite complete (nothing noteworthy happened after 1997?), and some of the information/statistics (particularly civic administration, utitilies, and education) are outdated. If these issues are not addressed, a featured article review may eventually happen. Hog FarmBacon04:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Hog Farm's concerns above. The history section ends in 1997 (and has huge gaps in coverage), civic administration needs update their representatives for the latest election, and the transport sections should be updated with new information and merging this information together should be considered per WP:OVERSECTION. Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? If not, it might be nominated at WP:FAR. Z1720 (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
