Talk:Digital electronics
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Digital electronics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]User:69.140.78.87 complained about the explanation of levels. Another user complained about the explanation of PLDs; most really are look-up tables, but some are table-controlled general logic functions, so I added a note. User: Ray Van De Walker—Preceding undated comment added 19:08, 16 November 2005
Naming Convention
[edit]There seem to be confusion about two main topics in digital design: 1) digital electronics which is CMOS level design and 2) digital logic which is logic level design. Digital electronics is basically analog design of digital systems where tools such as pspice and cadence are used for simulation and design. On the other hand, digital logic is logic level design where tools such as xilinx, VHDL, or FPGAs are used for simulation and design.
For instance, in digital electronics an inverter is built using one nMOS and one pMOS (pure analog). This inverter is then used in digital logic to construct a flip flop (pure logic).
Properties >> Paragraph 7
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
needs a better example. "causes, at worst, a single click" is not a good example of "the meaning of large blocks of related data can completely change" Emdosis (talk) 20:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Bad redirect to here
[edit]See Talk:Digital_networks#Redirects_differently_than_its_singular comp.arch (talk) 08:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)