Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirasha
Article People's Republic of Kirasha listed on WP:VFD Apr 30 to May 7 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:
Claims to be a micronation. Unverifiable. --Michael Snow 17:14, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Absolutely ridiculous: 'The country is expanding from its original population of 2 to a high of 6 and it is in the process of establishing a provisional government and constitution.'Delete. Deus Ex 17:47, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Try creating a micronation yourself! It is an ongoing project! Please visit: People's Republic of Kirasha Homepage. Preserve until article and micronation can be further advanced. Creator of the People's Republic of Kirasha 30 Apr, 2004
- Website is under construction, no content. But it at least satisfies my curiosity on one point - I was wondering how any self-respecting micronation could claim to exist without having a website. --Michael Snow 20:10, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Maximus Rex 18:09, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete this piece of crap page PLEASE! --Phil Larin 19:48, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Even less real than most. Delete -- Cyrius|✎ 20:42, Apr 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Again, why don't you all try to create your own micronation. Maybe I posted the article at the wrong time but I don't see what is wrong with my micronation. Most micronations don't even have a website at all Creator of the People's Republic of Kirasha 30 Apr, 2004. KEEP!!
- You do realize that anonymous votes are ignored, right? And we're not interested in creating micronations, nor in listing them on a self-respecting encyclopedia which deals with real things. RickK 22:24, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Speak for yourself. Categorical statements implying that micronations are not "real" as micronations are a bit questionable, and to imply that a micronation could never have enough impact and influence in the "real" world to justify an encyclopaedia article is either premature, naive, or might paint you into a corner. The straw man of "creating micronations" is irrelevant, and as for "listing them on [sic] a self-respecting encyclopedia" opt me out of "our": a case-by-case basis is the best approach. --Daniel C. Boyer 23:29, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
- You do realize that anonymous votes are ignored, right? And we're not interested in creating micronations, nor in listing them on a self-respecting encyclopedia which deals with real things. RickK 22:24, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Delete now. RickK 22:24, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. --Brockert 23:19, Apr 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Perhaps some day soon we will all have our own micronations? Everyking 01:00, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. -Sean 10:05, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. -Kirasha
- You can only vote once. Sign one of your other votes and
strikethe rest of them. Welcome to Wikipedia. --Ben Brockert 22:09, May 3, 2004 (UTC)
- You can only vote once. Sign one of your other votes and
- Delete this and all other bogus "micronation" articles. - Lucky 6.9 20:45, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
- Until its own website offers some more informaton (FAQ is empty, government structure undescribed, &c.) my vote is to delete, unless the article is going to be revised. A micronation that is only in the process of establishing a provisional government -- i.e. in such a state of preparation is not at present deserving of an article. But my vote could change to keep if this moves. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:27, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
End discussion