Talk:For Better or For Worse

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the For Better or For Worse article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This page is not a forum for general discussion about For Better or For Worse. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about For Better or For Worse at the Reference desk.

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Mtigwaki was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 02 July 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into For Better or For Worse. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Comics: Strips / Canadian High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comic strips work group.
	This article is supported by Canadian comics work group.

Animation: Canadian Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Farley, Schulz, and Snoopy

The page says Schulz "jokingly" threatened to kill Snoopy if Farley died. I did not get the impression that Schulz was joking from the Michaelis book or from the link in the footnotes.Ceblair (talk) 00:13, 18 August 2019 (UTC)ceblair[reply]

to be when?

John Patterson: He is the husband to the strip's protagonist Elly, and dad-to-be.

Eh? He was always father of at least two. Was this written during April's gestation, or what? —Tamfang (talk) 01:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

talk-page archival

I've archived the first ten years of this page's discussions (which also happened to be all posts older than ten years) as well as those by InternetArchiveBot (talk · contribs); that can all be found in the link automatically populated in the header of this page or at /Archive 1. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 19:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]