Talk:Gerald L. K. Smith
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
untitled
[edit]Every other source I find says he only got 1780 votes in 1944. Which ever it is I would like to see the votes from Texas and Michigan confirmed. Thanks Pimpalicious
Contemporary culture
[edit]The movie Gentleman's Agreement (1947) included a diatribe against antisemites which included Gerald L. K. Smith in the list. The movie went on to win an Academy Award for best picture and best director. While I generally dislike "in popular culture" sections articles, this one seems appropriate because the movie and its awards occurred during the hight of Smith's activities. Shall we find room for this in the article? Rklawton (talk) 03:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- No reason to. The couple of mentions Smith gains in that film are incidental. Philip Cross (talk) 11:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Page move
[edit]Why was the article moved from Gerald L. K. Smith to Gerald Lyman Kenneth Smith? Aside from some biographical articles that give his complete name, most of the references to him seem to use one or two middle initials. Will Beback talk 05:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
You can move it back, I just wanted make sure the redirect was there. When you move it back the redirect will still be there. I was using the name from from the biographies and in Who is who, and as he used. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- The name that the subject used is important, but it isn't the sole consideration. Checking Google Books, I see that [Gerald L. K. Smith][1] gets 1,201 hits, while [Gerald Lyman Kenneth Smith][2] brings just 239. The main biography of the subject is Gerald L. K. Smith: Minister of Hate . So if there's no objection, I'll move it back. Will Beback talk 06:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- On further review, I see it's a close call between the two versions. For example, the Gale collection has two biographies of him that are about the same length, one in a book of prominent clergy and the other part of a series of general history. One uses the initials while the other spells it out. I'll post it to the RfM page and see if there are any other opinions. In the meantime, I'll add the version with the initials as an alternate so that it'll still show up in a text search. Will Beback talk 08:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was confirmed short form of name — ækTalk 16:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Gerald L. K. Smith → Gerald Lyman Kenneth Smith —
Gerald Lyman Kenneth Smith → Gerald L. K. Smith — The long and short versions of this name are both used commonly. The article was recently moved to the long version. Should we move it back or keep it here? Will Beback talk 09:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- It was quickly moved back after this request was posted - so this is just to confirm the name.
- Support move to 'Gerald L. K. Smith'. GoodDay (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support present form with initials as more recognizable. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support present form with redirect from long form. --BaronLarf 04:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- Further comment - Gerald L. K. Smith is definitely the most common look-up form. Carrite (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
does Gerald LK Smith group still exsist New Nationalist 3rd partys in US.Baseing their ideas on America First Party?
[edit]Does the America First Party still exsist? Gerald LK Smiths "church"? Also,heard that new 21st.cent. Nationalist(a code name for facists?) base there ideas on his America First Party etc? Didnt he have a Passion Play at his church AS WELL? tHAT LEFT IN ANTI SEMETIC REMARKS? T14HANKS! dR.eDSON aNDRE' jOHNSO d.d.uC FOUNDER n>p>f>a> NATIONALIST PARTY fOR aAMERICA88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.203.36.139 (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
WASNT HIS CHURCH HAVING A PASSION PLAY TOO? New 21st cent 3rd Parties useing Gerald LK Smiths ideas?
[edit]Dont presdent day(21st,cent) Nationalist Parties in the US base there ideas on The America First Party of rev .Smith? Didnt his "church" present a Passion Play with anti sementice remarks left in? Thanks! Dr.Edson Andre' Johnson D.D.ULC Founder N.P.F.A.1488 National Party For America(founded 1998)64.203.36.139 (talk) 20:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Should we really use the word populist in this context?
[edit]Smith seems to have basically been a Nazi/fascist. Populism is a distinct historical movement, in the 1880s and 1890s and conflation is not really correct. Populism especially in the mid-west and west was also quite secular while this guy is very Christian.
Huey Long
[edit]- Unlike Long, who had been relatively tolerant on racial issues...
Huey Long, whom Wikipedia describes as the "the political boss of Louisianna", was all for black voting rights in Louisianna? Why did we need the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act then? Nobs01 (talk) 02:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- According to this source, Long tried discrediting political opponent Benjamin Pavy with an appeal to Southern racism. The article says: "Judge Pavy had planned to retire, but for insurance, Long allegedly began spreading a rumor that Pavy had “Negro blood,” hoping to delegitimize him in the eyes of voters." Total random nerd (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you. I'll make the correction. Nobs01 (talk) 04:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Unknown-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Wisconsin articles
- Low-importance Wisconsin articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- C-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Unknown-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States articles