Wikipedia talk:Foldoc license
 | Wikipedia:Foldoc license is permanently protected from editing because it is a page that should not be edited significantly for legal or other reasons. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit protected}} to notify an administrator to make the requested edit.
|
Shouldn't this page be protected? --Anon
- Yeah, I guess so. Protected. --mav
- It appears as if the "Edit this page" option could be removed on protected pages, such as the Wikipedia:Foldoc license. /Wikiborg
FOLDOC is *not* a "public domain resource"
[edit]- See also: Wikipedia:Public domain resources
I don't see how that link relates to anything. What do public domain resources have to do with FOLDOC? FOLDOC is not a public domain work; it is restricted under United Kingdom copyright law and international treaties and licensed to the public under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. Shouldn't this notice be changed to point to GFDL resources, of which FOLDOC is one, instead of public-domain resources? --Damian Yerrick (☎) 15:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. The 'see also' notice is obviously wrong. It must be changed to point to "Wikipedia:GNU Free Documentation License resources". --Kanjy 10:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed. Ral315 (talk) 06:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Interwiki link
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove all interwiki links. They are handled by Wikidata.--GZWDer (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
