Talk:Muztagh Tower

China Stub‑class

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Position

Double check the coordinates for this mountain; Peakware site lists as 35.833 N, 76.3667 E. [1]. The coordinates quoted in the article appears to be that of Rakaposhi Mountain.

--smr 08:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

EverestNews.com's entry on the Mustagh Tower headlines the summit as being 7284. The text then describes a twin summit, with the West Summit being 7270m, while the East Summit was 7273m. Joe Brown said it was a 'surprise' when they found two summits on the first ascent in 1956. Joe Brown and Ian McNaught-Davies reached the lower (West) summit on 6 July 1956, but couldn't tell which of the two summits was higher. They abandoned an attempt to cross between the two summits. My understanding is that the second team from the 1956 expidition reached BOTH summits on 7 July 1956 in order to ensure that they had conclusively 'nailed it'.

The SECOND summit referred to in the Wiki entry relates to the NORTH-EAST RIDGE summit, which EverestNews.com reports as being 7180 (agrees with the Wiki entry) and was first climbed in 1984 by a Anglo-US team. My understanding is that the East and West Summits wouldn't normally count as 'separate summits', but the very close height and the question that arises as to 'who' reached the 'top' first has required some 'explanation'. The 'true' second summit is the 7180 peak on the NE Ridge. Tban 02:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took out most of the stuff about the multiple summits for now, since it wasn't properly sourced anyway, and what I see so far is contradictory. I will try to piece together what I have from the AAJ, Neate, and EverestNews.com. -- Spireguy (talk) 03:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sellas Photograph

Vittorio Sella took more than one pictures of Muztagh Tower during the 1909-expedition. I don't know, but I assume that the foto in the article (by Jan. 2014) might not be the one the mountaineerers were talking about. Maybe it was the one on the right. But there are even some more, see Category:Muztagh Tower on Commons. --Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muztagh Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301155344/http://www.sport1.si/gallery/item/1429 to http://www.sport1.si/gallery/item/1429/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Muztagh Tower Pakistan Animation Video.gif

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Muztagh Tower Pakistan Animation Video.gif

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]