Jump to content

Talk:Graffiti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleGraffiti is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 18, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 24, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 4, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
December 6, 2005Featured article reviewKept
May 16, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
October 16, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
October 24, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article


Art or vandalism?

[edit]

A huge amount of this article is devoted to the notion of graffiti as an artform, and yet the majority of graffiti is criminal juvenile tagging, endlessly repeated, without talent, originality or imagination. Nowhere does the article mention that graffiti is unpopular, and yet it is. A 2014 Yougov poll (for example), conducted in the UK, showed that only 15% of the population actually liked graffiti, whereas 45% of the population positively disliked it, albeit that a slim majority agreed with the (totally irrelevant) postulation that some graffiti could be considered art. It goes without saying that some graffiti could of course be considered art: but unfortunately it's only about 0.001% of it. Surely the unpopularity of graffiti should be mentioned? ( This unsigned edit was added 19:03, 11 September 2021 by IP 185.108.92.22 )

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2024

[edit]

Pizza — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.127.18.77 (talk) 18:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2024

[edit]

Pizza — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.108.207 (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2024

[edit]

CHANGE: trains were covered in graffiti (1973). TO: train covered in graffiti (1973).

The original caption states that "trains were covered in graffiti"; implying all trains (since 'train(s)'), used to be (since 'were') covered in graffiti. The photo shows one singular train covered in graffiti and does not cite any sources stating that every single train in NYC was covered in graffiti in 1973; which was allegedly since removed. ParanormaI (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you were able to complete this yourself. Thanks for fixing the caption! Marking as answered. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Huge long article without any mention of the term copyright. Why? Likewise: graffiti is not mentioned in public domain, why ? Wuerzele (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]