Talk:The Godfather Part III

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Godfather Part III article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Historical background

One of the references being used in the "historical background" section is, at the very least, incomplete and is, in its current state, not useful:

"Item notes". The Economist. The University of California. 1843. pp. v. 286–289.

This is reference #25 and, as you can see, the information provided is not accurate or useful. This needs to be sorted out or removed. Can anyone make any sense of this? ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recut

Should we mention this new recut briefly in the lead? Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 14:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Not in my opinion. At least wait until it has been seen and judged.
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - the recut should be mentioned. There's absolutely nothing wrong about mentioning in the lead (with relevant sources) the news about the upcoming recut by Coppola. --82.181.143.171 (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat, maybe after it has been seen and reviewed
Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 10:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Gareth. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Godfather Part II DVD commentary (2005)

In Special:Diff/448514779 (2011-09-05), HangingCurve added: "In his audio commentary for Part II, he stated that only a dire financial situation caused by the failure of New York Stories compelled him to take up Paramount's long-standing offer to make a third installment." with the reference "The Godfather Part II DVD commentary featuring Francis Ford Coppola, [2005]". But in Special:Diff/553573879 (2013-05-05), someone changed this to "[...] the failure of One From The Heart [...]", without touching the reference, so that it is not clear whether the new claim was sourced or not, and it potentially contradicted the source. A contributor in the French WP who listened to the entire audio commentary has said that this was not mentioned. So I have removed the claim in Special:Diff/995355606. Does anyone have additional information? — Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-added the sentence, slightly modified, with new sources. — Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]