Jump to content

Talk:Odwalla

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleOdwalla is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 19, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 30, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 30, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 23, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
October 16, 2021Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Plant a Tree

[edit]

Could we get a section on their effort/annual programs to plant trees in state parks? 168.179.217.57 (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the Name Odwalla

[edit]

The information on "Illustrum" in the Origin section is incorrect. On the liner notes to the Art Ensemble of Chicago's "Fanfare for the Warriors," the recording that "Illustrum" appears in, the music for the piece is attributed to Malachi Favors and the myth/poem to Joseph Jarman. Roscoe Mitchell did later write a piece called "Odwalla," which appears on the Art Ensemble's recording "Bap-tizum." But it was Jarman who created the myth/poem for "Illustrum" and gave the character the name Odwalla. 162.90.144.23 (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Jeffrey Schanzer[reply]

Intro

[edit]

The intro to this article seriously needs work. Its paragraphs are uneven, the information is poorly organized, and some of it's redundant. Tezero (talk) 02:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Bod (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Odwalla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA in need of review

[edit]

This Featured Article was promoted in 2008 and has never been reviewed since. The main editor has left Wikipedia in 2009, which has left the article permanently stuck in 2007/2008.

The brand was recently discontinued and this is how the History section ends:

"Coca-Cola promoted Odwalla products in 2006 when the company aimed at removing carbonated soda products in schools.[37] Odwalla continued to have good growth in 2007, when Coca-Cola, squeezed by poor growth in its North American markets, issued a company-wide hiring freeze; Odwalla, because of its good performance, was one of the few exceptions to the rule.[38]
In July 2020, Coca-Cola announced the permanent discontinuation of all Odwalla products, having declared Odwalla one of its "zombie brands" (brands which comprise less than 2% of total revenue)."

There is a 13-year gap there that is not befitting of a Featured Article.

I also found the following scholarly works, that cover a E. coli outbreak and how the company reacted to it, that ought to be included in the article:

Since the article has not been updated, coupled with the failure to integrate recent scholarly works that offer a retrospective look on the response to the 1996 E. coli outbreak, means that this article fails criteria 1. b) of Featured Articles, comprehensiveness. If the above issues are not corrected, the article may be nominated for Featured Article review. RetiredDuke (talk) 17:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with RetiredDuke about the additional use of sources that might be useful for the 1996 E. Coli outbreak section. I also think the sources should be reevaluated, with fool.com removed as it is an unreliable source. I would also like to see information about the company between 2006 and 2020. Z1720 (talk) 22:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree as well. I don't think this is featured-article quality.

Possible image?

[edit]

The French article includes this image in the infobox, is it possible that this article can also include it? There is some copyright stuff that might not allow this though... Thanks - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]