Talk:Thomas Lovejoy

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Smithsonian Institution Archives

This article is related to the Smithsonian Institution Archives. Learn more about this collaborative project to document the history of the world's largest museum complex, and how you can get involved, here.Smithsonian Institution ArchivesWikipedia:GLAM/SIATemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian Institution ArchivesSmithsonian Institution Archives-related articles

Untitled

What in the world does this mean:

(1980:331, SE:252)

It makes no sense to me at all. --Jose Ramos 04:13, 13 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Looks like citations of some sort. Like, the book he wrote in 1980, page 331. I'm not sure about the second one though. Adam Bishop 04:17, 13 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I found a quote bearing on this issue, and edited the article to reflect it. --Jose Ramos 07:33, 13 Sep 2003 (UTC)

And in the first reference, I find Lovejoy is generally credited with having brought the tropical forest problem to the fore as a public issue. He was the first person to use the term biological diversity (in 1980).

Notice José, that the word mentionned is biological diversity

The second bio just indicate the same.

This is consistent with what I read in my french books (though his name is unfortunately mentionned no where) and wrote on the biodiversity article.

Biological diversity -> 1980 by Lovejoy

Biodiversity -> staff of the 1986 forum + Wilson

If you agree with this, we could update the biodiversity article for more accuracy

Anthère

See: Misleading Math about the Earth I removed this cheap little snipe, since there isn't actually any such article, hence 'cheap' Wetman 02:02, 23 Nov 2003 (UTC)