Talk:Level 42

The Answer to life, the universe and Everything

Is this band related to this concept?

Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything

First single and first two albums

The article states they were 'entirely an instrumental act' initially. This is quite wrong, although a common perception. Their early repertoire included Haunted House (by Lee Oscar & played at their first ever gig), Night Train, Wings of Love, Love Meeting Love, Autumn. These are all songs with vocals. The instrumentals were 88, Woman, Theme to Margaret, Mr. Pink, Sandstorm. It was pretty much 50/50. Even if you described them as 'predominantly instrumental' I think that would be a stretch although Haunted House and Night Train didn't make the studio sessions. Even for the 'Level 42' album there were vocal live tracks that also didn't make the studio: Nothing More To Say, Morning Silence. LFG — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.60.80.114 (talk) 12:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Was The Sun Goes Down really the first single? I seem to recall The Chinese Way predated it - or maybe that was later??? Also, is it worth mentioning the first two albums (IMHO much better than their later stuff, not that I'd say that in the article!) GRAHAMUK

Never mind - I've researched it and rewritten the article more or less completely. If anyone is not happy with it, well, you know what to do! GRAHAMUK 01:49 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)

The first two albums are very important! I saw that 'the early tapes' was not mentioned. AHHHHHHH!!!! This album is considered by the fans to be quite important because it shows the real jazz-funk origin of the band. The band even in 2005 is still playing track from that album in Live gigs. That why i edited the article

The article says 'Love Games' was the band's first Polydor single. It wasn't. The first Polydor Single was Love Meeting Love, the second was '(Flying on the) Wings of Love' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.60.80.114 (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Name Origin

Name origin: I'd heard that the band's name might have been taken from a sign on a lift or passageway seen in the Doctor Who serial The Invisible Enemy; I seem to recall something like this being mentioned in the notes in Douglas Adams' radio scripts book, although this Doctor Who storyline apparently aired before Mr. Adams' involvement with that program. B7T 13:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Did they specifically say it was a reference to 42 from the Hitchhiker's novel? The radio series came first and if they named the band in 1979, my guess is it came from the original instance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.231.143 (talk) 04:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Boon/R Gould

Although Boon was always known as 'Boon' he was actually usually credited for writing as 'R Gould' and only rarely 'B Gould'. Although he hasn't been called 'Rowland' since he was very young, it's important he's credited under his real name for accounting purposes.

Boon/Phil mismatch in caption

Boon and Phil are credited the wrong way round on the "Running in the Family" cover pic.

In the origin of the band's name, one suggestion is Tower 42. Considering the building was only named as such in the late 1990s, this seems rather unlikely...

Recent/Edits

The page has been edited recently, but a number of factual errors have been added. 'Learn To Say No' was never released as a single (although this was planned). The idea of a line-up history is a good one, but the one that's been added is inaccurate - the Guaranteed line-up should really cite Allan Holdsworth and not Jakko. Also no mention of Topping/Gelder etc. Need to tidy up - I'll do this soon. LFG

Singles

Hi, it would like to count with the help of all for the construction of own goods for the singles of the group, and even important music. Sitam-if you liberate to help. Thanks.

Morrissey Quote?

Surely the Morrissey quote is bizarre and irrelevant enough to remove from consideration. Morrissey is an artist but is not a legitimate rock critic. Furthermore, no citation was supplied. I did google up a reference to this quote but it was a page that was loaded with further quotes about 80s-era bands that were all supplied without further reference. Barring dissent, I will remove the quote in the next few days. Mojo Tooth 00:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

"Legitimate rock critic"? Isn't that a contradiction in terms?71.90.26.140 08:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Startingatthesun.jpg

Image:Startingatthesun.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Level 42 1988-1989.JPG

Image:Level 42 1988-1989.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Levelalbumcover.jpg

Image:Levelalbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Covellvl4th.jpg

Image:Covellvl4th.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fancruft

This article suffers from unsourced, non-referenced, pseudo rock journalism and opinionated fancruft. For only one example - "Dismayed at what he felt was the record company's ineptitude, Gould played only one promotional gig and did not go on the road for the Forever Now tour". Whilst the article has some references, there are large portions without verifiability; allowing all sorts of POV to creep in. I think it needs a radical overhaul to reduce the press release styled nonsense, and return to a more balanced, referenced and encyclopedic tone. Anyone disagree ?

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Most successful single.

Maybe it should say "Their most successful single in the UK was "Lessons in Love"", since in the US, it was Something About You. I never even heard LiL played anywhere here in the US, other than from my CD player. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbw9999 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good to meYellowxander (talk) 11:10, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Clean-Up

There are several sentences in the article that feel very wrong to me. However, since I don't speak British English, I am not going to change them. Rather I will just bring them to your attention and suggest that a native Brit either adjust them or leave them as is. 1. Level 42 are an English pop rock and jazz-funk band, who had a number of worldwide and UK hits during the 1980s and 1990s. (I believe the who should be which). 2. After much success as a live and studio band in the 1980s, Level 42's commercial profile diminished during the early 1990s... (This sentence seems to indicate that Level 42's commercial profile had much success as a band rather than Level 42 itself). 3. Also included in the shows was an acoustic set, with Mike Lindup playing the accordion. (This seems to be a very backward way to say it. I would say "An acoustic set was also included in the shows featuring Mike Lindup playing the accordian.) 4. At a performance in Bournemouth, ex-drummer Gary Husband returned due to Pete Ray Biggin being unavailable. (Why not just say "At a performance in Bournemouth, ex-drummer Gary Husband returned because Pete Ray Biggin was unavailable."?)190.117.216.229 (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)