Talk:Economy of Venezuela

Venezuela Top‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Economy of Venezuela#cite note-17|<sup>[17]</sup>]]
[[Economy of Venezuela#cite note-18|<sup>[18]</sup>]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Pérez, Carlos Andrés, gobiernos de. Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela de la Fundación Polar

from what i been hearing so far about Venezuela the country is so in aspect of business areas

i suggested that the government of Venezuela should pay attention on the business man in the country so that the citizens will be okay and they won't be any problems from the citizens 102.90.47.126 (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GDP numbers off by 1000X?

I see the GDP and GDP PPP listed as 96,000 BILLION (96 Trillion) and 216,000 BILLION (216 Trillion). Should that not be "million" or 96.000 / 216.000? 71.178.27.6 (talk) 15:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Number of Internet subscribers has increased tenfold"

Such vague statemets have no plays in enciclopedias. I mean, what are the two points that bound the time which has seen the tenfold increase? They are not mentioned it seems.

This article doesn't meet basic objectivity standards expected from an encyclopedia

There are sections of this article that read more like a piece of antichavist propaganda than anything anyone should read in a serious encyclopedia. Besides the blatant lack of objectivity and the biased tone of the writing, I also spotted several outright falsehoods that are easily verifiable. For the time being I'm flagging the article for NPOV while I contact an administrator. 147.161.103.248 (talk) 11:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't work that way. Administrators do not decide how articles are written, editors do. Your objections are too vague to flag the article. I say that because there is no way of knowing if your objections had been met.

If you want to improve the article, you need to provide specific objections. For example, you say there are falsehoods in the article. Can you point them out? TFD (talk) 11:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]