Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"fansy the famous bard"

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 21:36, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"fansy the famous bard"

Unencyclopedic videogame trivia. CDC (talk) 00:40, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete all player characters from MMORPGs, CRPGs, and pen-and-paper RPG campaigns. android↔talk 00:51, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Not notable. Dsmdgold 00:57, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
Delete all player characters from MMORPGs, CRPGs, and pen-and-paper RPG campaigns. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:10, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Jinx! android↔talk 01:15, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable. --Randolph 01:14, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. bardcruft. -- 8^D ^gab 01:52, 2005 Apr 27 (UTC)
Delete all player characters from MMORPGs. They're simply not encyclopedic. Mgm|^(talk) 11:10, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
Comment. I'm of two minds on this one. Fansy is all but an EQ community celebrity; this isn't vanity, it's a community joke and famous troll. (The ugly Geocities-ness of the fansy page doesn't help, but it's part of the joke.) Then again, it is just an EQ thing. Maybe there's somewhere this could be merged? A Man In Black 12:29, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. What part of all player characters is ambiguous or controversial? Ben-w
- Fansy is arguably notable as an EQ joke, not as an EQ user. A Man In Black 06:14, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Doesn't even meet the standards of fancruft. Even fans wouldn't be interested in this. Sjakkalle 09:39, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Bah. Delete. This is better suited to a theoretical Sullon Zek or Zek article. A Man In Black 05:06, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.