Talk:Poisoned

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software.

Apple Inc.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles

Untitled

Copied from the deletion debate.

After removing the unimportant raving about who did what to whom, is there anything left worth keeping? And if it's decided to keep, is it legal for us to have those logos? And do we need all of them? Rick K 22:08, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete - non-notable, Wikipedia is not ~~Freshme~~ VersionTracker. -- Cyrius|&#9998 22:28, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to something or delete Bensaccount 02:00, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep, I added a bit more information and NPOV'ed the "history" section -Plop 15:36, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)
Comment: This seems to be something for Apple computers, and I don't know enough about them to know whether it is worth an article. But as the current article doesn't answer this question, it is substandard IMO and could still be deleted as an advert. The logos have been removed, and are now orphaned images, claimed to be Public Domain but the justifying link uses an obsolete URL for a site that no longer exists. These logos seem to be for previous versions, and don't appear on the new (current) website. Andrewa 18:09, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete: insignificant, advert. WP is not SourceForge. Software has reached version 0.515. Come back in a few years, guys. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:28, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Cribcage 07:00, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep, although the project history header is pretty worthless. I use the program sometimes and it's actually one of the better of the P2P programs for the Mac (and seems to be growing in popularity). RADICALBENDER ★ 14:17, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Never heard of this project. Wikipedia is not Freshmeat. We can write an article if/when this project becomes as famous as, say, Napster. —Psychonaut 15:46, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Instead of criticize this article, you could make this article better like Plop. When there's an article about KaZaA, as the most popular P2P-app for Windows, there has to be an article about the most popular P2P-app for Mac, which is Poisoned. So, you keep Poisoned and KaZaA in the Wikipedia, or delete both! -- CdaMVvWgS 21:02, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Actually now that the stupid ashton/xfactor/etc part of the Project History section is gone, I think it's a much better article. Plop 13:27, Apr 15, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Instead, how about we include Poisoned with an article about giFT or OpenFT along with all of the other associated clients (like KCeasy).
- That sounds like a good idea. By the way, you should sign your vote. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:30, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. This is the most popular p2p application for the Macintosh, which is the second most used desktop behind Windows. There are articles on other p2p applications, some less popular, why is this one being picked on? Hanpuk 11:08, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete/Redir - I'm a linux user, and as significant as mldonkey is to me, it didn't make an impact on the P2P world. If anything, this should be a re-direct or disambiguation page. - Gamera2 21:02, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Very famous on google. BL 07:31, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)

No consensus. Kept DJ Clayworth 20:47, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)